IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v243y2024ics095183202300769x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal tasks assignment policy in multi-task multi-attempt missions

Author

Listed:
  • Levitin, Gregory
  • Xing, Liudong
  • Dai, Yuanshun

Abstract

Motivated by real-world applications like unmanned reconnaissance aerial vehicles, this paper considers a multi-task multi-attempt mission system, where each task may be attempted multiple times and each attempt may be performed simultaneously by multiple components to enhance the task completion probability. Such an active redundancy, on the other hand, incurs high cost and high risk associated with the failures of the components. To balance the reward and the risk, this paper formulates and solves a new optimization problem, which determines the number of components performing each uncompleted task in each attempt, referred to as the task assignment policy (TAP), minimizing the expected mission cost (EMC). A recursive algorithm is proposed to evaluate the EMC (aggregating the expected operational cost, cost of lost components, and cost associated with uncompleted tasks) for the considered multi-task multi-attempt system under a given TAP. Based on the suggested EMC evaluation algorithm, the genetic algorithm is implemented to solve the optimal TAP problem. A detailed case study of an unmanned reconnaissance aerial vehicle system performing five independent surveillance tasks is conducted to examine the impacts of several model parameters on the EMC, task successful completion probabilities, and the optimal TAP solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2024. "Optimal tasks assignment policy in multi-task multi-attempt missions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:243:y:2024:i:c:s095183202300769x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109855
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202300769X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109855?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:243:y:2024:i:c:s095183202300769x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.