IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v145y2016icp250-261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probabilistic Safety Assessment of twin-unit nuclear sites: Methodological elements

Author

Listed:
  • Le Duy, Tu Duong
  • Vasseur, Dominique
  • Serdet, Emmanuel

Abstract

When assessing the risk related to Nuclear Power Plants in terms of impacts on the population health and on the environment, multi units issues should be taken into account. Generally speaking, to date mainly models relating to a single unit have been developed by operators. The purpose of this paper is to present possible solutions or methodological options, suggested by EDF (Electricity of France) R&D, in order to switch from a risk assessment for the unit to a risk assessment for the site. The case of a site with two units is addressed here. A review of practices and standards showed that the specific aim of a PSA at site level was to deal with the dependencies existing between the units on that site. The risk calculation for the site is therefore proposed for six configurations resulting from the combination of two types of scenarios and three types of systems which are defined. The treatment of CCF events and the adaption of the assessment of the Human Errors Probabilities to the case of multiple units are also addressed in this paper. The proposed approach is illustrated using a simplified case inspired by the EDF 900MWe units level 1 PSA model.

Suggested Citation

  • Le Duy, Tu Duong & Vasseur, Dominique & Serdet, Emmanuel, 2016. "Probabilistic Safety Assessment of twin-unit nuclear sites: Methodological elements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 250-261.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:145:y:2016:i:c:p:250-261
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015002161
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Taotao & Modarres, Mohammad & Droguett, Enrique López, 2021. "Multi-unit nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment: A comprehensive survey," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Le Duy, Tu Duong & Vasseur, Dominique, 2018. "A practical methodology for modeling and estimation of common cause failure parameters in multi-unit nuclear PSA model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 159-174.
    3. Kim, Dong-San & Park, Jin Hee & Lim, Ho-Gon, 2020. "A pragmatic approach to modeling common cause failures in multi-unit PSA for nuclear power plant sites with a large number of units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    4. Arigi, Awwal Mohammed & Park, Gayoung & Kim, Jonghyun, 2020. "Dependency analysis method for human failure events in multi-unit probabilistic safety assessments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    5. Zhang, Sai & Du, Mengyu & Tong, Jiejuan & Li, Yan-Fu, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization of maintenance program in multi-unit nuclear power plant sites," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 532-548.
    6. Yoon, Jae Young & Kim, Dong-San, 2022. "Estimating the adverse effects of inter-unit radioactive release on operator actions at a multi-unit site," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:145:y:2016:i:c:p:250-261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.