IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v269y2024ics092552732400001x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balance between profit and fairness: Regulation of online food delivery (OFD) platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Ji, Xu
  • Li, Xuerong
  • Wang, Shouyang

Abstract

The rapidly developing online food delivery business is a novel “ecosystem” involving digital platforms, restaurants, delivery-workers, and customers. Continuous expansion of its market size is accompanied by problems of economic fairness such as “wage distribution” and “revenue sharing”. This study proposes an overall modeling framework to examine how regulators could best achieve optimal regulatory balance between “protecting the restaurant margins” and “protecting the interests of delivery-workers” in both monopoly and duopoly competition environments. We show that wage floor regulation can benefit delivery-workers under certain conditions but come at the expense of the ecosystem's other stakeholders. By contrast, a policy of commission cap could increase both restaurants' revenues and the ecosystem's overall welfare. The results of this study provide feasible insights for improving the regulatory effectiveness of digital platforms in fast-evolving businesses such as prepared food delivery.

Suggested Citation

  • Ji, Xu & Li, Xuerong & Wang, Shouyang, 2024. "Balance between profit and fairness: Regulation of online food delivery (OFD) platforms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:269:y:2024:i:c:s092552732400001x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092552732400001X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109144?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:269:y:2024:i:c:s092552732400001x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.