IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v170y2015ipcp801-804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The worst-case performance of the Cube per Order Index slotting strategy is infinitely bad – A technical note

Author

Listed:
  • Schuur, Peter C.

Abstract

A well-known and frequently applied policy to assign stock keeping units (SKUs) to (dedicated) storage locations in a warehouse is the Cube per Order Index (COI) slotting strategy. Basically, COI stores an SKU based on how frequently it is picked per unit of stock space required. Fast movers are located close to the Input–Output points. For single command order picking, COI slotting is well-known to minimize order picking travel time. For multi command this is no longer true. An interesting question is: how bad can it be? In this paper we show that there is no limit to this badness. Worst-case behavior of COI is infinitely bad. We construct a worst-case example that proves the following. Given an arbitrary positive integer p, there is (i) a warehouse configuration (ii) a set of SKUs (iii) a set of orders for these SKUs such that slotting these SKUs in the warehouse according to COI leads to an order picking travel time which is p times larger than the order picking travel time produced by an optimal slotting strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Schuur, Peter C., 2015. "The worst-case performance of the Cube per Order Index slotting strategy is infinitely bad – A technical note," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PC), pages 801-804.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:170:y:2015:i:pc:p:801-804
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527315001796
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carl Kallina & Jeffrey Lynn, 1976. "Application of the Cube-Per-Order Index Rule for Stock Location in a Distribution Warehouse," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 37-46, November.
    2. Ronald J. Mantel & Peter C. Schuur & Sunderesh S. Heragu, 2007. "Order oriented slotting: a new assignment strategy for warehouses," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 301-316.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kovács, András, 2011. "Optimizing the storage assignment in a warehouse served by milkrun logistics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 312-318, September.
    2. Silva, Allyson & Coelho, Leandro C. & Darvish, Maryam & Renaud, Jacques, 2020. "Integrating storage location and order picking problems in warehouse planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. Jonas F. Leon & Yuda Li & Mohammad Peyman & Laura Calvet & Angel A. Juan, 2023. "A Discrete-Event Simheuristic for Solving a Realistic Storage Location Assignment Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Gu, Jinxiang & Goetschalckx, Marc & McGinnis, Leon F., 2010. "Research on warehouse design and performance evaluation: A comprehensive review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 539-549, June.
    5. Bortolini, Marco & Faccio, Maurizio & Gamberi, Mauro & Manzini, Riccardo, 2015. "Diagonal cross-aisles in unit load warehouses to increase handling performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PC), pages 838-849.
    6. Subir S. Rao & Gajendra K. Adil, 2017. "Analytical models for a new turnover-based hybrid storage policy in unit-load warehouses," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 327-346, January.
    7. Yang, Peng & Zhao, Zhijie & Guo, Huijie, 2020. "Order batch picking optimization under different storage scenarios for e-commerce warehouses," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    8. Yu, Y. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2007. "Optimal Zone Boundaries for Two-class-based Compact 3D AS/RS," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-034-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    9. de Koster, M.B.M. & Le-Duc, T. & Roodbergen, K.J., 2006. "Design and Control of Warehouse Order Picking: a literature review," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2006-005-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    10. de Koster, Rene & Le-Duc, Tho & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2007. "Design and control of warehouse order picking: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 481-501, October.
    11. Yu, Y. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2006. "Optimal Storage Rack Design for a 3D Compact AS/RS with Full Turnover-Based Storage," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2006-026-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    12. Gu, Jinxiang & Goetschalckx, Marc & McGinnis, Leon F., 2007. "Research on warehouse operation: A comprehensive review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 1-21, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:170:y:2015:i:pc:p:801-804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.