IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unreported bycatch in the New Zealand West Coast South Island hoki fishery


  • Bremner, Graeme
  • Johnstone, Peter
  • Bateson, Tracy
  • Clarke, Philip


There are recognised benefits to managing fisheries by individual transferable quotas (ITQs), but ITQs may increase incentives to discard fish. Trawl data from government-observed trawlers in the New Zealand hoki fishery were used to predict catches of unobserved vessels. These predictions were compared with the catches unobserved vessels reported. Unobserved vessels' reported catches were significantly different to observed vessels' catches. There was clear evidence of misreporting in the hoki fishery. Misreporting deprives stakeholders of rentals, distorts catch statistics, and threatens the integrity of ITQ systems. If reporting is similarly biased in other fisheries, the issue cannot be safely ignored.

Suggested Citation

  • Bremner, Graeme & Johnstone, Peter & Bateson, Tracy & Clarke, Philip, 2009. "Unreported bycatch in the New Zealand West Coast South Island hoki fishery," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 504-512, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:33:y:2009:i:3:p:504-512

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Stewart, James & Leaver, Jonathan, 2015. "Efficiency of the New Zealand annual catch entitlement market," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 11-22.
    2. Simmons, Glenn & Stringer, Christina, 2014. "New Zealand׳s fisheries management system: Forced labour an ignored or overlooked dimension?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 74-80.
    3. Mukherjee, Zinnia, 2015. "An economic approach to understanding the international transfer of bycatch from unilateral bycatch reduction policies," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 190-195.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:33:y:2009:i:3:p:504-512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.