IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v87y2019ics0264837717301990.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of structural systems analysis for the integrated water resources management in the Nenetzingo river watershed, Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Manzano-Solís, Luis Ricardo
  • Díaz-Delgado, Carlos
  • Gómez-Albores, Miguel Angel
  • Mastachi-Loza, Carlos Alberto
  • Soares, Denise

Abstract

Currently, many parts of the world are facing challenges resulting from poor water quality and water scarcity. To achieve water sustainability under this scenario, the main causes of water problems must be addressed while simultaneously dealing with their consequences. The development of a systemic perspective of water management is vital for facing such challenges. Integrated water resources management (IWRM) is one approach that analyzes water management from a systemic perspective, and structured systems analysis is a generalized and complementary approach that can facilitate the analysis of water management systems. The objective of this study was to perform a structural analysis of the water management system of the Nenetzingo River watershed (Mexico), with the goal of providing strategic and tactical guidance for the integrated water resources management of the watershed. Thus, in this study, a structural analytical method (cross-impact matrix multiplication applied to classification [MICMAC]) and a strategic planning perspective were employed. Modifications to the MICMAC method were necessary to comply with the objectives of the present study, leading to the proposal of an enhanced MICMAC method, denominated e-MICMAC. Overall, 49 variables were identified as relevant to the water management system of Nenetzingo, of which eight strongly influence the other variables and 10 are dependent on the dynamics of the system. In addition, nine variables serve as links between the influential and the dependent variables, while 18 variables were unable to be clearly characterized. Finally, three variables were excluded from the systems analysis without impact. Of the total variables, 22 were found to be essential to the system’s dynamics and were considered key variables. These key variables were then used to provide strategic and tactical guidance for the IWRM of the study basin. In conclusion, the structural analysis approach enabled the structure of the studied system to be elucidated. The variables that constituted the system were determined in addition to their relationships of influence or dependence. Lastly, the complexity of the analysis was reduced through the determination of key variables. The present structural analysis represents an important tool for achieving the sustainability of water resources in the Nenetzingo watershed and can strengthen planning measures in both the short and the long term while facilitates the definition of scenarios for the implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Manzano-Solís, Luis Ricardo & Díaz-Delgado, Carlos & Gómez-Albores, Miguel Angel & Mastachi-Loza, Carlos Alberto & Soares, Denise, 2019. "Use of structural systems analysis for the integrated water resources management in the Nenetzingo river watershed, Mexico," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:87:y:2019:i:c:s0264837717301990
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837717301990
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Godet & Régine Monti & Francis Meunier & Fabrice Roubelat, 2000. "La caja de herramientas de la prospectiva estratégica," Working Papers hal-02185401, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clara Tinoco & Natalia Julio & Bruno Meirelles & Raúl Pineda & Ricardo Figueroa & Roberto Urrutia & Óscar Parra, 2022. "Water Resources Management in Mexico, Chile and Brazil: Comparative Analysis of Their Progress on SDG 6.5.1 and the Role of Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Christian Mera-Parra & Fernando Oñate-Valdivieso & Priscilla Massa-Sánchez & Pablo Ochoa-Cueva, 2021. "Establishment of the Baseline for the IWRM in the Ecuadorian Andean Basins: Land Use Change, Water Recharge, Meteorological Forecast and Hydrological Modeling," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Guadalupe Yolanda Valenzuela-Morales & Marivel Hernández-Téllez & María de Lourdes Ruiz-Gómez & Miguel Angel Gómez-Albores & Ricardo Arévalo-Mejía & Carlos Alberto Mastachi-Loza, 2022. "Water Conservation Education in Elementary Schools: The Case of the Nenetzingo River Catchment, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Christian Mera-Parra & Priscilla Massa-Sánchez & Fernando Oñate-Valdivieso & Pablo Ochoa-Cueva, 2022. "Territorial Prospective to Sustainability: Strategies for Future Successful of Water Resource Management on Andean Basins," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Carlos Vergara-Schmalbach & Tomás Fontalvo Herrera & José Morelos Gómez, 2014. "La planeación por escenarios aplicada sobre políticas urbanas: el caso del mercado central de Cartagena (Colombia)," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 0(1), pages 23-33, June.
    2. José David Pinilla Manrique & Juan Carlos Martínez Torres & Juan Carlos Cabarcas Reyes, 2017. "Capacidades de innovación del sector salud en Barranquilla: Un análisis prospectivo a 2025," Revista Economía y Región, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, vol. 11(1), pages 127-154, June.
    3. Juan Carlos Vergara-Schmalbach & Tomás Fontalvo Herrera & José Morelos Gómez, 2014. "La planeación por escenarios aplicada sobre políticas urbanas: el caso del mercado central de Cartagena (Colombia)," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 0(1), pages 23-33, June.
    4. Andrés González Duperly, 2020. "Dimensiones humanas en acción : ser para saber obrar hacia una dirección integral de vida –fundamentos y marco conceptual," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, number 153, April.
    5. Chalapud, Eduardo D., 2022. "Prospectiva estratégica del subsector comercio del municipio de Ipiales – Colombia, hacia el ano 2030," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 23(1), pages 139-166, January.
    6. Londoño-Pulgarin, Diana & Cardona-Montoya, Giovanny & Restrepo, Juan C. & Muñoz-Leiva, Francisco, 2021. "Fossil or bioenergy? Global fuel market trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    7. Freddy Marín-González & Judith Pérez-González & Alexa Senior-Naveda & Mercy Narváez-Castro & Sharmila Rani Moganadas & Eduardo Garcés-Rosendo, 2023. "Betting Scenario for the Management of University Professional Practices from the Conformation of Intersectoral Cooperation Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:87:y:2019:i:c:s0264837717301990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.