IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v54y2016icp583-592.html

Socio-economic effects of agricultural land conversion for urban development: Case study of Hanoi, Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen, Thi Ha Thanh
  • Tran, Van Tuan
  • Bui, Quang Thanh
  • Man, Quang Huy
  • Walter, Timo de Vries

Abstract

Agricultural land conversion for urban development is a major process in the vicinity of many cities in Vietnam. This causes problems for the fabric of local society. In this paper, we evaluate four agricultural land’s acquisition projects in two areas (Hoai Duc district and Thanh Oai district) in Hanoi, Vietnam to examine two primary questions: (1) how do farmers obtain any economic benefit from urban development projects? And, (2) how are socio-economic livelihoods of the farmers effected by land conversion? The investigation relied on a market land price's survey using a structured-interview method, in which 395 land-acquired households were randomly selected. The responses indicate that there are unequal benefits among the various stakeholders. On average farmers tend to benefit the least. Although the farmers have the possibility to transform their agricultural livelihood into a non-agricultural one with probably a higher income, they are actually faced with many difficulties in maintaining non-agricultural activities, in finding stable alternative livelihood activities, and in using the compensation for investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen, Thi Ha Thanh & Tran, Van Tuan & Bui, Quang Thanh & Man, Quang Huy & Walter, Timo de Vries, 2016. "Socio-economic effects of agricultural land conversion for urban development: Case study of Hanoi, Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 583-592.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:54:y:2016:i:c:p:583-592
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837716301764
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip F. Kelly, 1999. "Everyday Urbanization: The Social Dynamics of Development in Manila’s Extended Metropolitan Region," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 283-303, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philip F. Kelly, 2003. "Urbanization and the Politics of Land in the Manila Region," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 590(1), pages 170-187, November.
    2. Edsel E. Sajor & Rutmanee Ongsakul, 2007. "Mixed Land Use and Equity in Water Governance in Peri‐Urban Bangkok," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 782-801, December.
    3. Nhung Pham Thi & Martin Kappas & Daniel Wyss, 2020. "Benefits and Constraints of the Agricultural Land Acquisition for Urbanization for Household Gender Equality in Affected Rural Communes: A Case Study in Huong Thuy Town, Thua Thien Hue Province, Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Rigg, Jonathan, 2006. "Land, farming, livelihoods, and poverty: Rethinking the links in the Rural South," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 180-202, January.
    5. Lieba Faier, 2021. "Planetary Urban Involution In The Tokyo Suburbs," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 630-642, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:54:y:2016:i:c:p:583-592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.