IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v168y2026ics0264837726001493.html

Land concentration, market regulation, and rural development: Rethinking agricultural land governance in Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Ibatullin, Shamil
  • Dorosh, Yosyp
  • Sakal, Oksana
  • Krupin, Vitaliy
  • Tsybulska, Julia

Abstract

Land concentration and the regulation of agricultural land markets are central challenges for equitable and sustainable rural development. This paper examines Ukraine’s agricultural land market through the lens of a human rights-based approach, highlighting the tensions between market mechanisms, social equity, and sustainable land governance. Ukraine represents a unique case, undergoing simultaneous post-socialist transformation, wartime disruption, and prospective accession to the European Union. Using official land market monitoring data (2021–2025), statistical and spatial analyses, and comparative perspectives with EU member states, the study evaluates land distribution dynamics, pricing, and the impact of war on market functioning. Results show that despite wartime conditions, the market remains active but exhibits undervaluation, high inequality, and accelerating concentration of ownership. The Gini coefficient of 0.469 for individual landowners confirms rising disparities, exacerbated by the 10,000-hectare ownership cap. These dynamics threaten small-scale farmers, biodiversity, and rural livelihoods, while existing state support measures remain insufficient to address structural imbalances. The analysis underscores the limitations of markets in securing land rights and the necessity of strong state regulation. Drawing on EU experience, the paper argues that aligning national land policy with principles of human rights, sustainability, and rural development is crucial. Ukraine’s case highlights broader debates on land governance, demonstrating how regulation can balance private property rights with societal interests in food security, ecological stewardship, and intergenerational justice.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibatullin, Shamil & Dorosh, Yosyp & Sakal, Oksana & Krupin, Vitaliy & Tsybulska, Julia, 2026. "Land concentration, market regulation, and rural development: Rethinking agricultural land governance in Ukraine," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:168:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001493
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726001493
    Download Restriction: Full text may be restricted for ScienceDirect subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rieznik , Stanislav & Beom , Lee Hwan, 2018. "The Role of Government in Agricultural and Rural Development: Review of Agricultural Policies in Ukraine after Independence with a Look at the EU and South Korea Experience," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(2), pages 132-145.
    2. Manuel Couret Branco, 2023. "Four principles for a human rights-based approach to development without growth," International Journal of Green Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1), pages 20-35.
    3. Deininger, Klaus & Squire, Lyn, 1998. "New ways of looking at old issues: inequality and growth," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 259-287.
    4. Steven E. Kraft, 1988. "Use of Natural Resources in a Market Economy: Ethical and Legal Perspectives," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(3/4), pages 8-21, March.
    5. Gorgan, Maxim & Hartvigsen, Morten, 2022. "Development of agricultural land markets in countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Korthals Altes Willem K., 2022. "Land Policy for Rural Development in the European Union and its Impact on Access to Land," European Countryside, Paradigm, vol. 14(4), pages 658-674, December.
    7. Gagalyuk, Taras & Ostapchuk, Igor & Lapa, Volodymyr & Balmann, Alfons, 2022. "Why did Ukraine become a Key Player on the World Agri-Food Markets? An Enterprise-Level Perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 71(3), pages 114-133.
    8. Hanna Klikocka & Aneta Zakrzewska & Piotr Chojnacki, 2021. "Characteristics of Models of Farms in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Shamil Ibatullin & Yosyp Dorosh & Oksana Sakal & Vitaliy Krupin & Roman Kharytonenko & Maria Bratinova, 2024. "Agricultural Land Market in Ukraine: Challenges of Trade Liberalization and Future Land Policy Reforms," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Gagalyuk, Taras & Ostapchuk, Igor & Lapa, Volodymyr & Balmann, Alfons, 2022. "Why did Ukraine become a Key Player on the World Agri-Food Markets? An Enterprise-Level Perspective," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 71(03), January.
    11. Bohdan Kyshakevych & Olga Melnyk & Yaroslav Kotyk & Yaroslav Lapchuk & Ivan Voronochak, 2025. "Technical Efficiency of Agriculture in the EU and Ukraine: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis Based on Factor Income," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 10(2), pages 231-250.
    12. Lucyna Błażejczyk-Majka & Radosław Kala & Krzysztof Maciejewski, 2012. "Productivity and efficiency of large and small field crop farms and mixed farms of the old and new EU regions," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(2), pages 61-71.
    13. Rieznik, Stanislav & Beom, Lee Hwan, 2018. "The Role of Government in Agricultural and Rural Development: Review of Agricultural Policies in Ukraine After Independence with a Look at the EU and South Korea Experience," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 8(02), January.
    14. Claudio Araujo & Catherine Araujo Bonjean & Jean-Louis Combes & Pascale Combes-Motel, 2006. "Land Tenure Insecurity and Economic Growth in Brazil," Revue d’économie du développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 14(5), pages 75-91.
    15. Derek Byerlee & Klaus Deininger, 2013. "The Rise of Large Farms in Land-Abundant Countries: Do They Have a Future?," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Stein T. Holden & Keijiro Otsuka & Klaus Deininger (ed.), Land Tenure Reform in Asia and Africa, chapter 14, pages 333-353, Palgrave Macmillan.
    16. Maria Cipollina & Nadia Cuffaro & Giovanna D’Agostino, 2018. "Land Inequality and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Marii Rasva & Evelin Jürgenson, 2022. "Europe’s Large-Scale Land Acquisitions and Bibliometric Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, June.
    18. Stanislav Rieznik & Hwan Beom Lee, 2018. "The role of government in agricultural and rural development: review of agricultural policies in Ukraine after independence with a look at the EU and South Korea experience," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(2), pages 132-145, July.
    19. Hossein Azadi & Eric Vanhaute, 2019. "Mutual Effects of Land Distribution and Economic Development: Evidence from Asia, Africa, and Latin America," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Kowalczyk, Cezary & Nowak, Magdalena & Źróbek, Sabina, 2019. "The concept of studying the impact of legal changes on the agricultural real estate market," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 229-237.
    21. Manuel Couret Branco, 2016. "Human Rights Based Approach to Land Reform," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 6(4), pages 1222-1222.
    22. Kowalczyk, Cezary & Źróbek-Różańska, Alina & Źróbek, Sabina & Kryszk, Hubert, 2021. "How does government legal intervention affect the process of transformation of state-owned agricultural land? The research methods and their practical application," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klaus Deininger & Denys Nizalov & Sudhir K Singh, 2013. "Are mega-farms the future of global agriculture? Exploring the farm size-productivity relationship for large commercial farms in Ukraine," Discussion Papers 49, Kyiv School of Economics.
    2. Hossein Azadi & Eric Vanhaute, 2019. "Mutual Effects of Land Distribution and Economic Development: Evidence from Asia, Africa, and Latin America," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Otsuka, Keijiro, 2012. "Presidential Address at 27th International Conference of Agricultural Economists, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil : Food Insecurity, Income Inequality, and the Changing Comparative Advantage in World Agriculture," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 127068, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Jain, Charu & Saxena, Disha & Sen, Somnath & Sanan, Deepak, 2023. "Women’s land ownership in India: Evidence from digital land records," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Nanhthavong, Vong & Bieri, Sabin & Nguyen, Anh-Thu & Hett, Cornelia & Epprecht, Michael, 2022. "Proletarianization and gateways to precarization in the context of land-based investments for agricultural commercialization in Lao PDR," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. Yeboah, F. Kwame & Jayne, T.S., "undated". "Africa’S Evolving Employment Structure," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Papers 259511, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    7. Ludovic Bequet, 2022. "Agricultural productivity and land inequality. Evidence from the Philippines," DeFiPP Working Papers 2203, University of Namur, Development Finance and Public Policies.
    8. Deininger, Klaus & Nizalov, Denys & Singh, Sudhir K, 2013. "Are mega-farms the future of global agriculture ? exploring the farm size-productivity relationship," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6544, The World Bank.
    9. Bequet, Ludovic, 2021. "Agricultural productivity and land inequality. Evidence from the Philippines," MPRA Paper 108131, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Lingerh Sewnet Akalu & Huashu Wang & Solomon Zena Walelign & Workineh Asmare Kassie & Fentahun Baylie, 2025. "The impact of large-scale agricultural investments on welfare of local communities: a meta-analysis," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Akalu, Lingerh Sewnet & Wang, Huashu & Walelign, Solomon Zena & Kassie, Workineh Asmare, 2024. "The Impact of Large-Scale Agricultural Investments on Welfare and Livelihoods of Local Communities: A Meta-Analysis," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344402, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    12. Hubert Kryszk & Krystyna Kurowska & Renata Marks-Bielska, 2022. "Legal and Socio-Economic Conditions Underlying the Shaping of the Agricultural System in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Sato, Sumie & Fukushige, Mototsugu, 2009. "Globalization and economic inequality in the short and long run: The case of South Korea 1975-1995," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 62-68, January.
    14. Grossmann, Volker, 2008. "Risky human capital investment, income distribution, and macroeconomic dynamics," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 19-42, March.
    15. Antonio Andres & Carlyn Ramlogan-Dobson, 2011. "Is Corruption Really Bad for Inequality? Evidence from Latin America," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(7), pages 959-976.
    16. Arief Anshory Yusuf, 2005. "A Survey on Growth and Inequality: Does Improved Inequality Data Have Anything to Say?," Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies (WoPEDS) 200501, Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University, revised Oct 2005.
    17. Obsa Urgessa Ayana & Jima Degaga, 2022. "Effects of rural electrification on household welfare: a meta-regression analysis," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 69(2), pages 209-261, June.
    18. Gelaw, Fekadu, 2009. "The Relationship Between Poverty, Inequality, and Growth in the Rural Ethiopia: Micro Evidence," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51915, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Jin, Hyun Joung & Kim, Jang-Chul & Su, Qing, 2025. "Economic freedom and market resilience: Safeguarding liquidity in times of crisis," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    20. Luis Bauluz & Yajna Govind & Filip Novokmet, 2020. "Global Land Inequality," PSE Working Papers halshs-03022318, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • P26 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:168:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.