IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v158y2025ics0264837725002467.html

Changes in land use within flood hazard areas between 1990 and 2018 in EU countries

Author

Listed:
  • Borowska-Stefańska, Marta
  • Wiśniewski, Szymon
  • Gros, Jan Moritz
  • Balážovičová, Lenka
  • Masný, Matej

Abstract

The main aim of the article is to assess the effectiveness of non-technical flood protection measures used in flood risk management as exemplified by the experience of Germany, Poland and Slovakia. For its implementation, relationships concerning changes in land use (between 1990 and 2018) of flood hazard areas (with 1% probability of flood occurrence) were identified, along with changes in legislation in three countries determining land development in those areas. The identification of historical changes will allow for the development of methods and procedures which are helpful in forecasting the development of the areas in question. Analysis has shown that the changes in land use within studied areas are closely related to legal aspects, especially the restrictions resulting from the implementation of the Floods Directive (2007/60/EC). Regarding the intensity of development in flood-prone areas, several periods can be distinguished in these countries. In the case of Poland and Slovakia, there are two periods: the first, when the intensity of development was highest between 1990 and 2006, largely due to the lack of appropriate legal provisions to inhibit development in flood-prone areas. The second period, from 2006 to 2012, shows the impact of EU regulations and a decrease in development intensity. In contrast, in Germany, the most intensity of development occurred between 2006 and 2012.

Suggested Citation

  • Borowska-Stefańska, Marta & Wiśniewski, Szymon & Gros, Jan Moritz & Balážovičová, Lenka & Masný, Matej, 2025. "Changes in land use within flood hazard areas between 1990 and 2018 in EU countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:158:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725002467
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725002467
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107712?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zoran Vojinovic & Michael Hammond & Daria Golub & Sianee Hirunsalee & Sutat Weesakul & Vorawit Meesuk & Neiler Medina & Arlex Sanchez & Sisira Kumara & Michael Abbott, 2016. "Holistic approach to flood risk assessment in areas with cultural heritage: a practical application in Ayutthaya, Thailand," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 589-616, March.
    2. Magdalena Rauter & Thomas Thaler & Marie-Sophie Attems & Sven Fuchs, 2019. "Obligation or Innovation: Can the EU Floods Directive Be Seen as a Tipping Point Towards More Resilient Flood Risk Management? A Case Study from Vorarlberg, Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, October.
    3. S. Balica & N. Wright & F. Meulen, 2012. "A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(1), pages 73-105, October.
    4. Isao Nakamura & Maria Carmen Llasat, 2017. "Policy and systems of flood risk management: a comparative study between Japan and Spain," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(2), pages 919-943, June.
    5. Ciro Apollonio & Gabriella Balacco & Antonio Novelli & Eufemia Tarantino & Alberto Ferruccio Piccinni, 2016. "Land Use Change Impact on Flooding Areas: The Case Study of Cervaro Basin (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Zoran Vojinovic & Michael Hammond & Daria Golub & Sianee Hirunsalee & Sutat Weesakul & Vorawit Meesuk & Neiler Medina & Arlex Sanchez & Sisira Kumara & Michael Abbott, 2016. "Holistic approach to flood risk assessment in areas with cultural heritage: a practical application in Ayutthaya, Thailand," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 589-616, March.
    7. Ewa Lechowska, 2018. "What determines flood risk perception? A review of factors of flood risk perception and relations between its basic elements," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(3), pages 1341-1366, December.
    8. Eoin O'Neill & Finbarr Brereton & Harutyun Shahumyan & J. Peter Clinch, 2016. "The Impact of Perceived Flood Exposure on Flood‐Risk Perception: The Role of Distance," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(11), pages 2158-2186, November.
    9. Borowska-Stefańska, Marta & Kobojek, Sławomir & Kowalski, Michał & Lewicki, Marek & Tomalski, Przemysław & Wiśniewski, Szymon, 2021. "Changes in the spatial development of flood hazard areas in Poland between 1990 and 2018 in the light of legal conditions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Mattia Amadio & Jaroslav Mysiak & Lorenzo Carrera & Elco Koks, 2016. "Improving flood damage assessment models in Italy," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(3), pages 2075-2088, July.
    11. Jean Hounkpè & Bernd Diekkrüger & Abel A. Afouda & Luc Olivier Crepin Sintondji, 2019. "Land use change increases flood hazard: a multi-modelling approach to assess change in flood characteristics driven by socio-economic land use change scenarios," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 98(3), pages 1021-1050, September.
    12. Susana Goytia, 2021. "Issues of Natural Resources Law for Adopting Catchment-Based Measures for Flood Risk Management in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    13. James Porter & David Demeritt, 2012. "Flood-Risk Management, Mapping, and Planning: The Institutional Politics of Decision Support in England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(10), pages 2359-2378, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neiler Medina & Yared Abayneh Abebe & Arlex Sanchez & Zoran Vojinovic, 2020. "Assessing Socioeconomic Vulnerability after a Hurricane: A Combined Use of an Index-Based approach and Principal Components Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-31, February.
    2. Borowska-Stefańska, Marta & Kobojek, Sławomir & Kowalski, Michał & Lewicki, Marek & Tomalski, Przemysław & Wiśniewski, Szymon, 2021. "Changes in the spatial development of flood hazard areas in Poland between 1990 and 2018 in the light of legal conditions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Hui Xu & Junlong Gao & Xinchun Yu & Qianqian Qin & Shiqiang Du & Jiahong Wen, 2024. "Assessment of Rainstorm Waterlogging Disaster Risk in Rapidly Urbanizing Areas Based on Land Use Scenario Simulation: A Case Study of Jiangqiao Town in Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Jin Su & Mo Wang & Mohd Adib Mohammad Razi & Norlida Mohd Dom & Noralfishah Sulaiman & Lai-Wai Tan, 2023. "A Bibliometric Review of Nature-Based Solutions on Urban Stormwater Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Laura Turconi & Francesco Faccini & Alessandra Marchese & Guido Paliaga & Marco Casazza & Zoran Vojinovic & Fabio Luino, 2020. "Implementation of Nature-Based Solutions for Hydro-Meteorological Risk Reduction in Small Mediterranean Catchments: The Case of Portofino Natural Regional Park, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Khalid Oubennaceur & Karem Chokmani & Florence Lessard & Yves Gauthier & Catherine Baltazar & Jean-Patrick Toussaint, 2022. "Understanding Flood Risk Perception: A Case Study from Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Nina Baron, 2020. "Flood protection beyond protection against floods: how to make sense of controversies related to the building and maintenance of dikes in Denmark," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 967-984, August.
    8. Shi-yu Hu & Miao Yu & Ting Que & Gang Fan & Hui-ge Xing, 2022. "Individual willingness to prepare for disasters in a geological hazard risk area: an empirical study based on the protection motivation theory," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(3), pages 2087-2111, February.
    9. Seong Yun Cho & Heejun Chang, 2017. "Recent research approaches to urban flood vulnerability, 2006–2016," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(1), pages 633-649, August.
    10. Yi Ge & Guangfei Yang & Xiaotao Wang & Wen Dou & Xueer Lu & Jie Mao, 2021. "Understanding risk perception from floods: a case study from China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(3), pages 3119-3140, February.
    11. Pilar Baquedano Julià & Tiago Miguel Ferreira, 2021. "From single- to multi-hazard vulnerability and risk in Historic Urban Areas: a literature review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 93-128, August.
    12. Alessandra Gandini & Leire Garmendia & Rosa San Mateos, 2017. "Towards sustainable historic cities: mitigation climate change risks," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 4(3), pages 319-327, March.
    13. H. Zaifoglu & A. M. Yanmaz & B. Akintug, 2019. "Developing flood mitigation measures for the northern part of Nicosia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 98(2), pages 535-557, September.
    14. Shanzhong Qi & Shufen Cao & Shunli Hu & Qian Liu, 2024. "Bibliometric analysis on urban flood and waterlogging disasters during the period of 1998—2022," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(14), pages 12595-12612, November.
    15. Ewa Lechowska, 2022. "Approaches in research on flood risk perception and their importance in flood risk management: a review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(3), pages 2343-2378, April.
    16. K. Graff & C. Lissak & Y. Thiery & O. Maquaire & S. Costa & B. Laignel, 2019. "Analysis and quantification of potential consequences in multirisk coastal context at different spatial scales (Normandy, France)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(2), pages 637-664, November.
    17. Sandra Fatorić & Erin Seekamp, 2017. "Securing the Future of Cultural Heritage by Identifying Barriers to and Strategizing Solutions for Preservation under Changing Climate Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Mizanur Rahman & Jeff Popke & Thomas W. Crawford, 2022. "Resident perceptions of riverbank erosion and shoreline protection: a mixed-methods case study from Bangladesh," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 2767-2786, December.
    19. Anna Porębska & Izabela Godyń & Krzysztof Radzicki & Elżbieta Nachlik & Paola Rizzi, 2019. "Built Heritage, Sustainable Development, and Natural Hazards: Flood Protection and UNESCO World Heritage Site Protection Strategies in Krakow, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-26, September.
    20. Gökçen Eryılmaz Türkkan & Tuğçe Hırca, 2021. "The investigation of flood risk perception as a quantitative analysis from socio-demographic perspective," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 715-733, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:158:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725002467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.