IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v125y2023ics026483772200521x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Realizing a rights-based approach to resettlement from protected areas: Lessons from Satpura Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh (India)

Author

Listed:
  • Sarma, Ujjal Kumar
  • Barpujari, Indrani

Abstract

Though the lifeworlds of many Indigenous and Local Communities (ILCs) across the world are deeply intertwined with nature, ‘fortress conservation’ has led to their exclusion from lands in which they have resided for generations with concomitant social and material costs. Enhanced evidence-based understanding on the untenability of ‘fortress conservation’, evolving international law on the rights of the Indigenous peoples and the advocacy of numerous actors in the international arena have led to the ascendency of the rights-based approach (RBA) in global conservation politics with long-standing struggles of ILCs over land and resources reframed as human rights. Though its effective realization on the ground has been stymied by pre-existing power asymmetries and inequal relationship between ILCs vis-à-vis other actors, nevertheless, RBA has gradually gained traction in the legal and policy framework governing conservation including resettlement from protected areas in countries like India. Using an anthropological, interpretative lens, this paper critically analyses the resettlement of Tribal and other traditional forest dwellers from the Satpura Tiger Reserve in the Central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh post the adoption of the NTCA Guidelines of 2011 which are in sync with the broad contours of RBA. The paper concludes that certain factors are crucial to the realization of RBA on the ground namely ‘Free, Prior and Informed Consent’ (FPIC), recognition and settlement of rights under relevant legal provisions, the assertion of free choices concerning resettlement options, livelihood and financial handholding as well as adequate provisioning for community facilities. However, certain challenges such as power asymmetries on the ground, quasi-egalitarian decision-making, limitations to the exercise of free choice and persistence of the earlier ‘need-based’ governmentality come in the way of realization of RBA in letter and spirit which need to be overcome for reconciling ‘conservation with justice’.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarma, Ujjal Kumar & Barpujari, Indrani, 2023. "Realizing a rights-based approach to resettlement from protected areas: Lessons from Satpura Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh (India)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:125:y:2023:i:c:s026483772200521x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772200521X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106494?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janine R. Wedel & Cris Shore & Gregory Feldman & Stacy Lathrop, 2005. "Toward an Anthropology of Public Policy," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 600(1), pages 30-51, July.
    2. Bina Agarwal, 1997. "''Bargaining'' and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1-51.
    3. Cernea, Michael, 1997. "The risks and reconstruction model for resettling displaced populations," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(10), pages 1569-1587, October.
    4. Kabra, Asmita, 2019. "Ecological Critiques of Exclusionary Conservation," Ecology, Economy and Society - the INSEE Journal, Indian Society of Ecological Economics (INSEE), vol. 2(01), January.
    5. Cernea, Michael M. & Schmidt-Soltau, Kai, 2006. "Poverty Risks and National Parks: Policy Issues in Conservation and Resettlement," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1808-1830, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramesh, Tharmalingam & Kalle, Riddhika & Sankar, Kalyanasundaram & Qureshi, Qamar & Giordano, Anthony J. & Downs, Colleen Thelma, 2019. "To resettle or not?: Socioeconomic characteristics, livelihoods, and perceptions toward resolving human-tiger conflict in the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 32-46.
    2. Lam, Lai Ming & Paul, Saumik, 2013. "Displacement and Erosion of Informal Risk-Sharing: Evidence from Nepal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 42-55.
    3. Vlaeminck, Pieter & Maertens, Miet & Isabirye, Moses & Vanderhpydonks, Filip & Poesen, Jean & Deckers, Jozef & Vranken, Liesbet, 2015. "Coping with landslide risk through preventive resettlement. Designing optimal strategies through choice experiments for the Mount Elgon region, Uganda," Working Papers 232715, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    4. Simone Gobien & Björn Vollan, 2016. "Exchanging Land for Solidarity: Solidarity Transfers among Voluntarily Resettled and Non-resettled Land-Reform Beneficiaries," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(3), pages 802-818.
    5. Simone Gobien & Björn Vollan, 2013. "Playing with the social network: Social cohesion in resettled and non-resettled communities in Cambodia," Working Papers 2013-16, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    6. Lauren Pandolfelli & Ruth Meinzen-Dick & Stephan Dohrn, 2008. "Gender and collective action: motivations, effectiveness and impact," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(1), pages 1-11.
    7. Bidhan Kanti Das & Nabanita Guha, 2016. "How do Women Respond in the Context of Acquisition of Agricultural Land? A Micro Level Study in Semi-urban South Bengal, India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 10(2), pages 253-269, August.
    8. Astrid Sneyers & Anneleen Vandeplas, 2013. "Girl Power in Agricultural Production: How Much Does it Yield? A Case-Study on the Dairy Sector in India," LICOS Discussion Papers 34113, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven.
    9. Leanne Roncolato & Alex Roomets, 2020. "Who will change the “baby?” Examining the power of gender in an experimental setting," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 823-852, September.
    10. Joshua Sikhu Okonya & Netsayi Noris Mudege & Anne M. Rietveld & Anastase Nduwayezu & Déo Kantungeko & Bernadette Marie Hakizimana & John Njuki Nyaga & Guy Blomme & James Peter Legg & Jürgen Kroschel, 2019. "The Role of Women in Production and Management of RTB Crops in Rwanda and Burundi: Do Men Decide, and Women Work?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Sarah Ryser, 2019. "The Anti-Politics Machine of Green Energy Development: The Moroccan Solar Project in Ouarzazate and Its Impact on Gendered Local Communities," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Vellore Arthi & James Fenske, 2018. "Polygamy and child mortality: Historical and modern evidence from Nigeria’s Igbo," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 97-141, March.
    13. Allendorf, Keera, 2007. "Do Women's Land Rights Promote Empowerment and Child Health in Nepal?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 1975-1988, November.
    14. Rie Makita, 2009. "The visibility of women’s work for poverty reduction: implications from non-crop agricultural income-generating programs in Bangladesh," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 26(4), pages 379-390, December.
    15. Marcin Wiśniewski & Krzysztof Šyskawa, 2020. "Development Impact Bonds in Financing Flood Risk Management," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 67(4), pages 437-452, December.
    16. Elke Holst & Andrea Schäfer & Mechthild Schrooten, 2010. "Gender, Transnational Networks and Remittances: Evidence from Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 296, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    17. Boulier, Bryan & Emran, M. Shahe & Hoque, Nazmul, 2021. "Access to Credit, Education, and Women’s Say in the Household: Evidence from Bangladesh," MPRA Paper 109009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Reddy, A Amarender, 2018. "(2018) Involuntary Resettlement as an Opportunity for Development: The Case of Urban Resettlers of the New Tehri Town, Journal of Land and Rural Studies 6(2) 1–25," AgriXiv szu6a, Center for Open Science.
    19. Farha Naz & Shahab E. Saqib, 2021. "Gender-based differences in flood vulnerability among men and women in the char farming households of Bangladesh," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 655-677, March.
    20. Thapa Karki, Shova & Hubacek, Klaus, 2015. "Developing a conceptual framework for the attitude–intention–behaviour links driving illegal resource extraction in Bardia National Park, Nepal," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 129-139.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:125:y:2023:i:c:s026483772200521x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.