IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v55y2018icp62-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of predictive data mining to create mine plan flexibility in the face of geological uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Ajak, Ajak Duany
  • Lilford, Eric
  • Topal, Erkan

Abstract

Geological uncertainty represents an inherent threat for all mining projects. Mining operations utilise resource block models as a primary source of data in planning and in decision making. However, such operational decisions are not free from risk and uncertainty. For the majority of iron ore mines, as an example, uncertainties such as clay pods and variability in grades and tonnages can have dramatic impacts on projects’ viability. However, a paradigm shift on how uncertainty is treated and a willingness to invest in areas that create operational flexibility can mitigate potential losses. Data analytics is touted as one of the major disruptions in the 21st century and operations that properly utilise data can create real opportunities in the face of an uncertain future. Since organisations have abundant definite geological data, a combination of data mining and real options can provide a competitive advantage. In the present study, predictive data mining algorithms were applied to a real case mine operation to predict the probability of encountering problematic ore in a mining schedule. The data mining model outputs were used to generate possible real options that the operations could exercise to deal with clay uncertainty. The most suitable data mining algorithm chosen for this task was the classification tree, which predicted the occurrence of clay with 78.6% precision. Poisson distribution and Monte Carlo simulations were applied to analyse various real options. The research revealed that operations could minimise unscheduled losses in the processing plant and could increase a project's present value by between 12% and 21% if the predictive data mining algorithm was applied to create real options.

Suggested Citation

  • Ajak, Ajak Duany & Lilford, Eric & Topal, Erkan, 2018. "Application of predictive data mining to create mine plan flexibility in the face of geological uncertainty," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 62-79.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:55:y:2018:i:c:p:62-79
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.10.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420717303987
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.10.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajak, Ajak Duany & Topal, Erkan, 2015. "Real option in action: An example of flexible decision making at a mine operational level," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 109-120.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rimélé, Adrien & Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos & Gamache, Michel, 2020. "A dynamic stochastic programming approach for open-pit mine planning with geological and commodity price uncertainty," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2022. "Considering the recent increase in license fees in Turkey, how can the negative effect of the fees on the mining operating costs be reduced?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Khan, Asif & Asad, Mohammad Waqar Ali, 2019. "A method for optimal cut-off grade policy in open pit mining operations under uncertain supply," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 178-184.
    4. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2022. "Supervisor fund expectation for the guarantee of salaries in the presence of the effect of permanent supervisor salaries on mining operating costs in Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. Jane H. Hodgkinson & Marc Elmouttie, 2020. "Cousins, Siblings and Twins: A Review of the Geological Model’s Place in the Digital Mine," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2023. "Changes in the salaries of mining engineers as they obtain managerial and OHS specialist positions in Turkey: By what criteria can salaries be increased?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. Linder, Eric & Marbuah, George, 2019. "The cost of transparency: Stock market reactions to introduction of the Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act in Canada," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Del Castillo, M. Fernanda & Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos, 2019. "Dynamically optimizing the strategic plan of mining complexes under supply uncertainty," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 83-93.
    9. Chimunhu, Prosper & Topal, Erkan & Ajak, Ajak Duany & Asad, Waqar, 2022. "A review of machine learning applications for underground mine planning and scheduling," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Acquah-Andoh, Elijah & Putra, Herdi A. & Ifelebuegu, Augustine O. & Owusu, Andrews, 2019. "Coalbed methane development in Indonesia: Design and economic analysis of upstream petroleum fiscal policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 155-167.
    2. Del Castillo, M. Fernanda & Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos, 2019. "Dynamically optimizing the strategic plan of mining complexes under supply uncertainty," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 83-93.
    3. Kuangyuan Zhang & Richard Olawoyin & Antonio Nieto & Andrew N. Kleit, 2018. "Risk of commodity price, production cost and time to build in resource economics," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 2521-2544, December.
    4. Savolainen, Jyrki, 2016. "Real options in metal mining project valuation: Review of literature," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 49-65.
    5. Raisa Pérez-Vas & Félix Puime Guillén & Joaquín Enríquez-Díaz, 2021. "Valuation of a Company Producing and Trading Seaweed for Human Consumption: Classical Methods vs. Real Options," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Miranda, Oscar & Brandão, Luiz E. & Lazo Lazo, Juan, 2017. "A dynamic model for valuing flexible mining exploration projects under uncertainty," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 393-404.
    7. Siña, Matías & Guzmán, Juan Ignacio, 2019. "Real option valuation of open pit mines with two processing methods," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 30-39.
    8. Jorge Tarifa-Fernández & Ana María Sánchez-Pérez & Salvador Cruz-Rambaud, 2019. "Internet of Things and Their Coming Perspectives: A Real Options Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Linder, Eric & Marbuah, George, 2019. "The cost of transparency: Stock market reactions to introduction of the Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act in Canada," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Mesias Alfeus & James Collins, 2023. "A novel stochastic modeling framework for coal production and logistics through options pricing analysis," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:55:y:2018:i:c:p:62-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.