IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v24y1996i6p681-688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integer programming formulations of statistical classification problems

Author

Listed:
  • Wilson, J. M.

Abstract

A series of approaches is presented to formulate statistical classification problems using integer programming. The formulations attempt to maximize the number of observations that can be properly classified and utilize single function, multiple function and hierarchical multiple function approaches to the problems. The formulations are tested using standard software on a sample problem and new approaches are compared to those of other authors. As the solution of such problems gives rise to various awkward features in an integer programming framework, it is demonstrated that new approaches to formulation will not be completely successful in avoiding the difficulties of existing methods, but demonstrate certain gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilson, J. M., 1996. "Integer programming formulations of statistical classification problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 681-688, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:24:y:1996:i:6:p:681-688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-0483(96)00027-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silva, Antonio Pedro Duarte & Stam, Antonie, 1994. "Second order mathematical programming formulations for discriminant analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 4-22, January.
    2. Stam, Antonie & Joachimsthaler, Erich A., 1990. "A comparison of a robust mixed-integer approach to existing methods for establishing classification rules for the discriminant problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 113-122, May.
    3. Abad, P. L. & Banks, W. J., 1993. "New LP based heuristics for the classification problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 88-100, May.
    4. Unknown, 1986. "Letters," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 1(4), pages 1-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mingue Sun, 2009. "Liquidity Risk and Financial Competition: A Mixed Integer Programming Model for Multiple-Class Discriminant Analysis," Working Papers 0102, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    2. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2006. "DEA-Discriminant Analysis: Methodological comparison among eight discriminant analysis approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 247-272, February.
    3. Zopounidis, Constantin & Doumpos, Michael, 2002. "Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 229-246, April.
    4. Loucopoulos, Constantine, 2001. "Three-group classification with unequal misclassification costs: a mathematical programming approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 291-297, June.
    5. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2004. "Mixed integer programming approach of extended DEA-discriminant analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(1), pages 45-55, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingue Sun, 2009. "Liquidity Risk and Financial Competition: A Mixed Integer Programming Model for Multiple-Class Discriminant Analysis," Working Papers 0102, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    2. Mingue Sun, 2009. "Liquidity Risk and Financial Competition: A Mixed Integer Programming Model for Multiple-Class Discriminant Analysis," Working Papers 0102, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    3. Glen, J.J., 2006. "A comparison of standard and two-stage mathematical programming discriminant analysis methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 496-515, June.
    4. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2006. "DEA-Discriminant Analysis: Methodological comparison among eight discriminant analysis approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 247-272, February.
    5. Zopounidis, Constantin & Doumpos, Michael, 2002. "Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 229-246, April.
    6. Antonie Stam & Cliff T. Ragsdale, 1992. "On the classification gap in mathematical programming‐based approaches to the discriminant problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(4), pages 545-559, June.
    7. Lam, Kim Fung & Moy, Jane W., 2002. "Combining discriminant methods in solving classification problems in two-group discriminant analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 294-301, April.
    8. Yanev, N. & Balev, S., 1999. "A combinatorial approach to the classification problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 339-350, June.
    9. J J Glen, 2008. "An additive utility mixed integer programming model for nonlinear discriminant analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(11), pages 1492-1505, November.
    10. Uney, Fadime & Turkay, Metin, 2006. "A mixed-integer programming approach to multi-class data classification problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(3), pages 910-920, September.
    11. Pedro Duarte Silva, A., 2017. "Optimization approaches to Supervised Classification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 772-788.
    12. Burcu Dikmen & Güray Küçükkocaoğlu, 2010. "The detection of earnings manipulation: the three-phase cutting plane algorithm using mathematical programming," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(5), pages 442-466.
    13. Adem, Jan & Gochet, Willy, 2006. "Mathematical programming based heuristics for improving LP-generated classifiers for the multiclass supervised classification problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(1), pages 181-199, January.
    14. Wanarat, Pradit & Pavur, Robert, 1996. "Examining the effect of second-order terms in mathematical programming approaches to the classification problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 582-601, September.
    15. J J Glen, 2005. "Mathematical programming models for piecewise-linear discriminant analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(3), pages 331-341, March.
    16. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2004. "Mixed integer programming approach of extended DEA-discriminant analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(1), pages 45-55, January.
    17. Geert Bekaert & Robert J. Hodrick, 2001. "Expectations Hypotheses Tests," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 56(4), pages 1357-1394, August.
    18. Nakashima, Kiyotaka & Ogawa, Toshiaki, 2020. "The Impacts of Strengthening Regulatory Surveillance on Bank Behavior: A Dynamic Analysis from Incomplete to Complete Enforcement of Capital Regulation in Microprudential Policy," MPRA Paper 99938, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Król, Michał, 2012. "Product differentiation decisions under ambiguous consumer demand and pessimistic expectations," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 593-604.
    20. G. Sujatha, 2018. "‘Is It Family or Politics?’ Reflections on Gender and the Modern Tamil Subjectivity Constitution in the Discourse of C. N. Annadurai," Studies in Indian Politics, , vol. 6(2), pages 267-281, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:24:y:1996:i:6:p:681-688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.