IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v22y1994i2p157-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirically testing the outcomes of user involvement in DSS development

Author

Listed:
  • Igbaria, M
  • Guimaraes, T

Abstract

The widespread use of decision support systems (DSS) for decisions critical to company survival and growth, and the sizeable investments most companies are increasingly making in the related technologies, motivate a better understanding of the factors contributing to DSS success. User involvement in the DSS development process has been proposed by many as an important determinant of success. This paper reports an empirical test of existing theory and the results from previous studies regarding the relationships between user involvement and three of the more widely used measures of system success: user overall satisfaction with the DSS, user perceived system benefits, and DSS usage. Two previously proposed intervening variables, systems friendliness and user satisfaction with DSS specific characteristics, are also included in the proposed path analytic model. A sample of 185 business managers and professionals provided the basis for statistical analysis using the partial least squares (PLS) method which tests both the measurement model and the structural model simultaneously. The results strongly confirm the importance of user involvement and DSS friendliness as determinants to the different measures of DSS success.

Suggested Citation

  • Igbaria, M & Guimaraes, T, 1994. "Empirically testing the outcomes of user involvement in DSS development," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 157-172, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:22:y:1994:i:2:p:157-172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(94)90076-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eom, Sean B, 1998. "The Intellectual Development and Structure of Decision Support Systems (1991-1995)," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 639-657, October.
    2. Walterscheid, Heinz & Vetschera, Rudolf & Hoffmann, Gunnar, 1994. "Die Entwicklung und Bewertung von managementunterstützenden Informationssystemen: Eine empirische Anwenderstudie," Discussion Papers, Series I 275, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.
    3. Lawrence, Michael & Goodwin, Paul & Fildes, Robert, 2002. "Influence of user participation on DSS use and decision accuracy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 381-392, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:22:y:1994:i:2:p:157-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.