IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The implementation of management science in higher education administration


  • White, Gregory P


Literature surveys during the 1970s found that many more management science models had been developed for higher education administration than had actually been implemented. This paper uses a survey of 146 recent articles to assess the current state of implementation in that area. The percentage of articles reported to have been implemented is presented for each administrative level, from departmental administration up to the federal level. Purposes for which the models were designed and the management science techniques used are also discussed as they relate to the record of successful implementation. The results are both surprising and informative. For example, although the largest number of models have been developed foruse at the presidential or vice presidential level of an institution, the highest percentage of successful implementations have occurred at the departmental administration level. There have been very few implementations at the state or federal levels. While scheduling was the one purpose for which the fewest number of models were developed, those models also had the highest rate of implementation. The most commonly used technique was mathematical programming, but it also had an extremely low percentage of ongoing implementations. The results indicate areas that need further work while also pinpointing areas that have probably been modelled too much.

Suggested Citation

  • White, Gregory P, 1987. "The implementation of management science in higher education administration," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 283-290.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:15:y:1987:i:4:p:283-290

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Mustafa, A. & Goh, M., 1996. "Multi-criterion models for higher education administration," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 167-178, April.
    2. Nicholls, Miles G. & Cargill, Barbara J., 2011. "Establishing best practice university research funding strategies using mixed-mode modelling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 214-225, April.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:15:y:1987:i:4:p:283-290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.