IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jimfin/v95y2019icp112-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A random walk through Mayfair: Art as a luxury good and evidence from dynamic models

Author

Listed:
  • Pownall, Rachel A.J.
  • Satchell, Stephen
  • Srivastava, Nandini

Abstract

The movement of international art prices in conjunction with other asset prices is preliminary to our understanding whether art is a luxury good. It is well known that there are linkages between art market prices and equity prices. However, less is known about the structure of dependence between these variables and the influence of gold prices and sentiment. We analyse art prices, at the outset using Granger causality and error correction models (ECM) to capture the long term dynamics between art prices, equity markets, gold prices and investor sentiment. The dataset we use is unique and covers British art prices from 1895 to the present. Initial results do not give a complete picture of price movements or a fitting description of wealth effects; to rectify this we look at short term dynamics in the art market. We assume a regime switching model to describe the movement of prices using a threshold variable that drives prices into possibly locally explosive regimes. These results indicate a dynamic wealth effect in that high (low) stock prices lead to subsequent increases (decreases) in art prices. However, this approach means that elasticities are now stochastic, and we redefine what a luxury good is. This is further explored by directly calculating elasticities from our model and its variants to analyse properties of art as a luxury good. Our threshold approach gives deeper insight into the impact of different market conditions than conventional ECM and cointegration modelling.

Suggested Citation

  • Pownall, Rachel A.J. & Satchell, Stephen & Srivastava, Nandini, 2019. "A random walk through Mayfair: Art as a luxury good and evidence from dynamic models," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 112-127.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jimfin:v:95:y:2019:i:c:p:112-127
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.04.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261560618305631
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.04.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heinrich Ursprung, 2020. "Jane Beats Them All: Price Formation and Financial Returns to Investing in Rare Books," CESifo Working Paper Series 8302, CESifo.
    2. Etro, Federico & Stepanova, Elena, 2021. "Art return rates from old master paintings to contemporary art," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 94-116.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Art prices; Cointegration; Granger causality; Luxury goods; Stochastic elasticities; Threshold models;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
    • C5 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling
    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jimfin:v:95:y:2019:i:c:p:112-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30443 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.