IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v99y2025ics0047235225001035.html

A methodological template for the next generation: Redesigning the STRONG-R needs assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Hamilton, Zachary
  • Mei, Xiaohan
  • Tostlebe, Jennifer J.
  • Allen-Flores, Baylee
  • Ursino, John
  • Kigerl, Alex

Abstract

Andrews and colleagues (1999) development of the Risk-Need-Responsivity model was a watershed moment for the field. As a result, Risk-Needs Assessments (RNAs) were shaped to identify needs domains, in which sub-scale scores are used to guide program-matching. Yet, despite ubiquitous use, needs assessments are an afterthought in RNA development, failing to demonstrate evidence and support for widespread application. Using 111,731 reentrants assessed via the Static Risk Offender Needs Guide–Revised (STRONG-R), we redesigned the needs assessment and establish construct validity via exploratory, confirmatory, multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, correlation, receiver operating characteristics, and regression techniques. Five multi-dimensional dynamic domains and a Global Needs Factor are established, demonstrating gender and race/ethnicity measurement invariance, moderate recidivism prediction accuracy, and relative gender and race/ethnicity parity. In addition to strong findings, we provide step-by-step instructions for the (re)development and validation of correctional needs assessments. Policy implications discus the importance of evaluating and updating current RNAs.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamilton, Zachary & Mei, Xiaohan & Tostlebe, Jennifer J. & Allen-Flores, Baylee & Ursino, John & Kigerl, Alex, 2025. "A methodological template for the next generation: Redesigning the STRONG-R needs assessment," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001035
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001035
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baglivio, Michael T. & Wolff, Kevin T. & Howell, James C. & Jackowski, Katherine & Greenwald, Mark A., 2018. "The search for the holy grail: Criminogenic needs matching, intervention dosage, and subsequent recidivism among serious juvenile offenders in residential placement," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 46-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bower, Marlee & Howard, Mark V.A. & Stapinski, Lexine A. & Doyle, Michael F. & Newton, Nicola C. & Barrett, Emma L., 2024. "The efficacy of ‘modular dosage’ in prison-based psychological interventions to reduce recidivism: A state-wide naturalistic study of convicted people in Australian prisons," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Sheppard, Keller G. & Talaugon, Alyssa R. & Hernandez, Jorge L., 2024. "Assessing the feasibility and performance of risk assessment instruments for early intervention and prevention services in Juvenile Justice," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Cuevas, Celina & Wolff, Kevin T. & Baglivio, Michael T., 2019. "Dynamic risk factors and timing of recidivism for youth in residential placement," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 154-166.
    4. Applegarth, D. Michael & Adams, Benjamin, 2023. "Screening, service provision, and information sharing practices of juvenile facilities," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Kyle A. Burgason & Matt DeLisi & Mark H. Heirigs & Abdi Kusow & Jacob H. Erickson & Michael G. Vaughn, 2020. "The Code of the Street Fights Back! Significant Associations with Arrest, Delinquency, and Violence Withstand Psychological Confounds," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Silver, Ian A. & D'Amato, Christopher & Newsome, Jamie & Johnson, Shelley & Rubenstein, Batya, 2023. "Forecasting the potential effects of programming combinations for justice-involved youths," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.