IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v35y2007i6p612-621.html

Type of contact and evaluations of police officers: The effects of procedural justice across three types of police-citizen contacts

Author

Listed:
  • Wells, William

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Wells, William, 2007. "Type of contact and evaluations of police officers: The effects of procedural justice across three types of police-citizen contacts," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 612-621, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:35:y:2007:i:6:p:612-621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-2352(07)00102-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaochen Hu & Xudong Zhang & Nicholas Lovrich, 2021. "Public perceptions of police behavior during traffic stops: logistic regression and machine learning approaches compared," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 355-380, May.
    2. Ana Isabel Sani & Vanessa Azevedo & Daniela Paulo & Mariana Magalhães & Laura M. Nunes, 2022. "Satisfaction with the Police: Perceptions and Related Variables from an Urban Community Sample," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Bolger, Michelle A. & Lytle, Daniel J. & Bolger, P. Colin, 2021. "What matters in citizen satisfaction with police: A meta-analysis," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. Abril, Veronica & Perez-Vincent, Santiago & Tobon, Santiago & Vanegas-Arias, Martin, 2024. "Do procedurally just interactions increase police legitimacy? Evidence from a representative vignette experiment in Colombia," SocArXiv 67urc, Center for Open Science.
    5. repec:osf:socarx:89shw_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Abril, Veronica & Perez-Vincent, Santiago & Tobon, Santiago & Vanegas-Arias, Martin, 2022. "How to measure public trust in the police? A framework with an application for Colombia," SocArXiv 89shw, Center for Open Science.
    7. Garth Heyer, 2025. "The Use of Public Satisfaction Surveys by the Police in New Zealand: Were Survey Respondents Satisfied with the Services Delivered by the New Zealand Police Following the Introduction of the Prevention First Strategy in 2011," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 885-905, September.
    8. Ferdik, Frank & Frogge, George & Cooney, Mikaela, 2022. "Exploring further determinants of citizen satisfaction with the police: The role of strain," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    9. Yue Yuan & Yuning Wu & Claudio Vera Sanchez, 2022. "Immigrant status and neighborhood context on perceptions of police procedural justice," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(7), pages 1659-1672, December.
    10. De Angelis, Joseph & Kupchik, Aaron, 2009. "Ethnicity, trust, and acceptance of authority among police officers," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 273-279, May.
    11. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:11:p:1700-1712 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Lorraine Mazerolle & Sarah Bennett & Matthew Manning & Patricia Ferguson & Elise Sargeant, 2010. "PROTOCOL: Legitimacy in Policing," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 1-32.
    13. Lee Ann Slocum, 2018. "The Effect of Prior Police Contact on Victimization Reporting: Results from the Police–Public Contact and National Crime Victimization Surveys," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 535-589, June.
    14. repec:osf:socarx:67urc_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Scott E. Wolfe & Justin Nix & Robert Kaminski & Jeff Rojek, 2016. "Is the Effect of Procedural Justice on Police Legitimacy Invariant? Testing the Generality of Procedural Justice and Competing Antecedents of Legitimacy," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 253-282, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:35:y:2007:i:6:p:612-621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.