IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v101y2025ics0047235225001758.html

The empirical clustering of crimes

Author

Listed:
  • McCarthy, Alora
  • Chen, Haomin
  • Fox, Bryanna
  • Verona, Edelyn

Abstract

Despite wide use among researchers and law enforcement, crime classification structures have received little empirical study to validate their theoretical models. Specifically, few studies have examined the empirical structure of crime categories across a large range of offenses to examine adherence to traditional classification systems (e.g., violent vs. non-violent; crimes against persons, property, and society). This study first identified how crimes clustered together empirically in a sample of Florida jail inmates (Aim 1; N = 832, 68% men, 72% White, 83% non-Hispanic) and then tested the replicability of that grouping in a second sample of justice-involved individuals in Illinois (Aim 2; N = 794, 62% men, 51% Black, 96% non-Hispanic). The psychological and behavioral correlates of the factors were then explored (Aim 3). Results from exploratory factor analysis in Sample 1 and exploratory structural equation modeling in Sample 2 indicated a 4-factor structure best fit the data, supporting and expanding the Uniform Crime Report/National Incident-Based Reporting System 3-factor model (i.e., crimes against persons, property, and society). Property and societal crime factors were highly replicable across samples; two factors related to violent crimes were present in both samples but differed in their composition, suggesting the need for more research to understand violent crime heterogeneity. Correlations between the crime factors and external criteria indicated mixed support for the construct coherence of the factors. Most consistently, all crime factors were related to callous unemotional, impulsive, and aggressive traits across samples, suggesting that these characteristics offer little discriminatory ability in understanding criminal behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • McCarthy, Alora & Chen, Haomin & Fox, Bryanna & Verona, Edelyn, 2025. "The empirical clustering of crimes," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:101:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001758
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001758
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102526?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rayees Farooq, 2022. "Heywood cases: possible causes and solutions," International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 79-88.
    2. Guerette, Rob T. & Stenius, Vanja M.K. & McGloin, Jean M., 2005. "Understanding offense specialization and versatility: A reapplication of the rational choice perspective," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 77-87.
    3. Tanskanen, Maiju & Aaltonen, Mikko, 2022. "Social correlates of specialized versus versatile offending patterns in intimate partner violence: A register-based study in Finland," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tanskanen, Maiju & Aaltonen, Mikko, 2022. "Social correlates of specialized versus versatile offending patterns in intimate partner violence: A register-based study in Finland," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Ünsal-Altuncan, Izel & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2024. "A hybrid forecasting model to predict the duration and cost performance of projects with Bayesian Networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 511-527.
    3. Baker, J & McPhedran, S, 2007. "Gun laws and sudden death: Did the Australian firearms legislation of 1996 make a difference?," MPRA Paper 40534, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. DeLisi, Matt & Piquero, Alex R., 2011. "New frontiers in criminal careers research, 2000-2011: A state-of-the-art review," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 289-301, July.
    5. Dubois, Marie-Ève & Ouellet, Frédéric & LeBlanc, Marc, 2025. "From theory to conceptualization, through operationalization: Comparing indicators of desistance from crime," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Simon Röck & Lukas Kleinheinz & Janette Walde, 2026. "Assessing Measurement Invariance of Subjective Well-Being Across European Countries," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 1-31, February.
    7. Monia Ranalli & Roberto Rocci, 2024. "Composite likelihood methods for parsimonious model-based clustering of mixed-type data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 18(2), pages 381-407, June.
    8. Maria Mahfoud & Wim Bernasco & Sandjai Bhulai & Rob van der Mei, 2021. "Forecasting Spatio-Temporal Variation in Residential Burglary with the Integrated Laplace Approximation Framework: Effects of Crime Generators, Street Networks, and Prior Crimes," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 835-862, December.
    9. Yonai, Shachar & Levine, Stephen Z. & Glicksohn, Joseph, 2013. "A national population based examination of the association between age-versatility trajectories and recidivism rates," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 467-476.
    10. Bart Cockx & Johan Egebark & Greet van Hoye & Emilie Videnord & Johan Vikström, 2026. "Motivating Job Seekers. A Field Experiment," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 26115, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:101:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.