IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v164y2023ics0148296323003661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“I Doubt It Works!” the negative impacts of anthropomorphizing healthcare products

Author

Listed:
  • Chang, Chun-Tuan
  • Lee, Hsiao-Ching
  • Lee, Yu-kang
  • Wang, Tsung-Pin

Abstract

This research proposes that anthropomorphism has negative downstream consequences in a healthcare product context. Using anthropomorphization in a product, package design or advertising can negatively affect consumers’ product evaluations. Anthropomorphized healthcare products look cute and fun, and can evoke compensatory inferences that the product itself may not be efficacious. This kind of lay belief reduces the consumer’s willingness to pay for the product. Study 1 shows that consumers have less of a preference for healthcare product anthropomorphism (vs. non-anthropomorphism). Study 2 shows that product anthropomorphism reduces consumers’ willingness to spend money on the product. The results also show that the effect of anthropomorphism on consumer preferences is mediated by lowered perceived product efficacy. Promotion focus (Studies 3a and 3b) and external health locus-of-control (Studies 4a and 4b) are found to reduce the negative impacts of anthropomorphism on product evaluations (i.e., attitude toward the product, purchase intention, or actual money spent).

Suggested Citation

  • Chang, Chun-Tuan & Lee, Hsiao-Ching & Lee, Yu-kang & Wang, Tsung-Pin, 2023. "“I Doubt It Works!” the negative impacts of anthropomorphizing healthcare products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:164:y:2023:i:c:s0148296323003661
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296323003661
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:164:y:2023:i:c:s0148296323003661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.