IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ireced/v49y2025ics1477388025000118.html

A purpose-driven approach to apply the universal design for learning: A focus on the “why”

Author

Listed:
  • Eyland, Terry
  • Leung, Ambrose

Abstract

We aim to develop a teaching methodology that can strike the best balance between clear terminal goals and deep understanding informed by the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) pedagogy. UDL is a pedagogical framework that promotes academic curriculum design to develop students into expert learners who are purposeful and motivated, resourceful and knowledgeable, strategic and goal-directed. The pedagogical method discussed in this paper entails the application of backward design with a strong focus on the “why” of learning to maintain curiosity and interest of students throughout the semester. A key element of our strategy involves assigning students with tasks that are based on relevant examples of broad interest to a diverse student population. This approach can effectively motivate the learning of theoretical concepts before further advancing the curriculum in class. The goal is to provide students with guidance to achieve higher levels of learning in a progressive way through scaffolding so that at all steps students see the purpose, have the resources to get going, but also have a little research to do to complete the task.

Suggested Citation

  • Eyland, Terry & Leung, Ambrose, 2025. "A purpose-driven approach to apply the universal design for learning: A focus on the “why”," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:49:y:2025:i:c:s1477388025000118
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iree.2025.100319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388025000118
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iree.2025.100319?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sam Allgood & Amanda Bayer, 2017. "Learning Outcomes for Economists," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(5), pages 660-664, May.
    2. Steven Yamarik, 2007. "Does Cooperative Learning Improve Student Learning Outcomes?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 259-277, July.
    3. Paul Hettler, 2015. "Active Learning in Economics: Increasing Student Engagement, Excitement and Success," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 21(4), pages 357-360, November.
    4. Roach, Travis, 2014. "Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 74-84.
    5. Aaron Swoboda & Lauren Feiler, 2016. "Measuring the Effect of Blended Learning: Evidence from a Selective Liberal Arts College," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 368-372, May.
    6. Cosgrove, Sarah B. & Olitsky, Neal H., 2020. "Research-based instructional strategies in a flipped principles of microeconomics classroom," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    7. Calimeris, Lauren & Sauer, Katherine M., 2015. "Flipping out about the flip: All hype or is there hope?," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 13-28.
    8. Lombardini, Chiara & Lakkala, Minna & Muukkonen, Hanni, 2018. "The impact of the flipped classroom in a principles of microeconomics course: evidence from a quasi-experiment with two flipped classroom designs," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 14-28.
    9. Olitsky, Neal H. & Cosgrove, Sarah B., 2016. "The better blend? Flipping the principles of microeconomics classroom," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 1-11.
    10. Sam Allgood & KimMarie McGoldrick, 2023. "Expanding diversity (in) undergraduate classes with advancements in (the) teaching (of) economics: A symposium," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 379-381, October.
    11. Nathan Wozny & Cary Balser & Drew Ives, 2018. "Evaluating the flipped classroom: A randomized controlled trial," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 115-129, April.
    12. Jose Vazquez & Eric Chiang, 2015. "Flipping Out! A Case Study on How to Flip the Principles of Economics Classroom," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 21(4), pages 379-390, November.
    13. Nan L. Maxwell & John R. Mergendoller & Yolanda Bellisimo, 2005. "Problem-Based Learning and High School Macroeconomics: A Comparative Study of Instructional Methods," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 315-329, October.
    14. Rita A. Balaban & Donna B. Gilleskie & Uyen Tran, 2016. "A quantitative evaluation of the flipped classroom in a large lecture principles of economics course," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 269-287, October.
    15. Picault, Julien, 2019. "The economics instructor’s toolbox," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Mikek, 2023. "A Flipped Classroom Experiment in Growth Theory," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 49(3), pages 433-456, June.
    2. Wolfe, Marketa Halova, 2020. "Integrating data analysis into an introductory macroeconomics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    3. Martinez, Gabriel X., 2023. "Studying like a nerd: Spacing, self-testing, and explanatory questioning in principles of microeconomics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    4. Yasukazu Ichino & Toru Kawai & Mifuyu Kira & Mai Seki, 2025. "The Effects of Flipped Classroom in Higher Education on Learning Outcomes and the Heterogeneity by Group Member Characteristics," OSIPP Discussion Paper 25E001, Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University.
    5. Calimeris, Lauren, 2018. "Effects of flipping the principles of microeconomics class: Does scheduling matter?," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 29-43.
    6. Becker, Ralf & Proud, Steven, 2018. "Flipping quantitative tutorials," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 59-73.
    7. Grogan, Kelly A., 2017. "Will this be on the test? How exam structure affects perceptions of innovative assignments in a masters of science microeconomics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 1-8.
    8. Cosgrove, Sarah B. & Olitsky, Neal H., 2020. "Research-based instructional strategies in a flipped principles of microeconomics classroom," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    9. Xiaodan Zhou & Ling-Hsiu Chen & Chin-Ling Chen, 2019. "Collaborative Learning by Teaching: A Pedagogy between Learner-Centered and Learner-Driven," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    10. Rita A. Balaban & Donna B. Gilleskie & Uyen Tran, 2016. "A quantitative evaluation of the flipped classroom in a large lecture principles of economics course," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 269-287, October.
    11. Gourley, Patrick, 2021. "Back to basics: How reading the text and taking notes improves learning," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    12. Leung, Ambrose & Moldovan, Lavinia & Ata, Michael, 2023. "Teaching economics in higher education with universal design for learning," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    13. R. Inglesi-Lotz & Fritz Dresselhaus & J. Bohlmann, 2015. "Assessing the Impact of Just-in-Time Methodology, In-Lecture Activities, and Tutor-Assisted Post-Lecture Activities in the Course Experience of First Year Students in Economics at the University of Pretoria," Working Papers 201590, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    14. Lombardini, Chiara & Lakkala, Minna & Muukkonen, Hanni, 2018. "The impact of the flipped classroom in a principles of microeconomics course: evidence from a quasi-experiment with two flipped classroom designs," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 14-28.
    15. Sahar Milani, 2023. "Teaching Environmental Macroeconomics to Undergraduate Students," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 49(3), pages 391-407, June.
    16. Pezzino, Mario, 2018. "Online assessment, adaptive feedback and the importance of visual learning for students. The advantages, with a few caveats, of using MapleTA," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 11-28.
    17. Jill Caviglia‐Harris, 2016. "Flipping the Undergraduate Economics Classroom: Using Online Videos to Enhance Teaching and Learning," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(1), pages 321-331, July.
    18. Hong, Bei, 2024. "Who watched pre/post-lecture tutorial videos? Does flipped learning help beginners in economics?," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    19. Martin S. Andersen & Dora Gicheva & Jeffrey Sarbaum, 2018. "Requiring Versus Recommending Preparation Before Class: Does It Matter?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(2), pages 616-631, October.
    20. Gemma Abió & Manuela Alcáñiz & Marta Gómez-Puig & Gloria Rubert & Mónica Serrano & Alexandrina Stoyanova & Montserrat Vilalta-Bufí, 2016. "“Retaking a course in Economics: Innovative methodologies to simulate academic performance in large groups”," IREA Working Papers 201609, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Apr 2016.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:49:y:2025:i:c:s1477388025000118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-review-of-economics-education .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.