IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v69y2018icp158-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The characterization of attention resource capacity and its relationship with fluid reasoning intelligence: A multiple object tracking study

Author

Listed:
  • Tullo, Domenico
  • Faubert, Jocelyn
  • Bertone, Armando

Abstract

Multiple object-tracking (MOT) paradigms have the potential to highlight attention resource capacities. However, there is a dearth in research exploring the relationship between individual differences in MOT capability and higher-level cognition, such as intelligence. Previous research has demonstrated that manipulating task demands, or the task's cognitive load, can help describe this relationship. Therefore, we assessed the relationship between performance on a 3D-MOT task at different levels of cognitive load (average speed for tracking 1, 2, 3 and 4 target objects out of 8 total objects), and fluid reasoning intelligence measured by the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-2nd edition (WASI-II). Also, we compared MOT performance between intellectual styles classified as: (i) low, medium or high fluid reasoning IQ, and (ii) fluid reasoning or verbal styles. As expected, speed scores decreased as target objects increased. This trend represents a proxy for attentional resource capacity as manipulations to both speed and target objects are able to highlight individual differences in available attentional resources. Furthermore, MOT capability at high load (4-targets) was the best predictor of fluid reasoning intelligence compared to lower loads (1–3 targets), and individuals with a fluid reasoning style and/or medium-high fluid reasoning intelligence outperformed individuals with a verbal style and low fluid reasoning IQ, respectively. These results describe the underlying commonalities between fluid reasoning intelligence and attention resource capacity, extending previous findings with working memory capacity. This study demonstrates that examining MOT as a measure of attention, rather than a phenomenon, can illustrate the potential to repurpose the use of this task to characterize attentional resource capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Tullo, Domenico & Faubert, Jocelyn & Bertone, Armando, 2018. "The characterization of attention resource capacity and its relationship with fluid reasoning intelligence: A multiple object tracking study," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 158-168.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:158-168
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2018.06.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289618300047
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2018.06.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven J. Luck & Edward K. Vogel, 1997. "The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions," Nature, Nature, vol. 390(6657), pages 279-281, November.
    2. Lana M. Trick & Tahlia Perl & Naina Sethi, 2005. "Age-Related Differences in Multiple-Object Tracking," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 60(2), pages 102-105.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bruner, Emiliano & Colom, Roberto, 2022. "Can a Neandertal meditate? An evolutionary view of attention as a core component of general intelligence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Igor S. Utochkin & Vladislav A. Khvostov & Yulia M. Stakina, 2017. "Ensemble-Based Segmentation in the Perception of Multiple Feature Conjunctions," HSE Working papers WP BRP 78/PSY/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    2. Jastrzębski, Jan & Ciechanowska, Iwona & Chuderski, Adam, 2018. "The strong link between fluid intelligence and working memory cannot be explained away by strategy use," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 44-53.
    3. Aki Kondo & Jun Saiki, 2012. "Feature-Specific Encoding Flexibility in Visual Working Memory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Hongwei Tan & Sebastiaan van Dijken, 2023. "Dynamic machine vision with retinomorphic photomemristor-reservoir computing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Robert W. Faff & Sebastian Kernbach, 2021. "A visualisation approach for pitching research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5177-5197, December.
    6. Yuri A. Markov & Natalia A. Tiurina & Igor S. Utochkin, 2018. "Different features are stored independently in visual working memory but mediated by object-based representations," HSE Working papers WP BRP 101/PSY/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    7. Jifan Zhou & Jun Yin & Tong Chen & Xiaowei Ding & Zaifeng Gao & Mowei Shen, 2011. "Visual Working Memory Capacity Does Not Modulate the Feature-Based Information Filtering in Visual Working Memory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-10, September.
    8. Nathaniel J. S. Ashby & Stephan Dickert & Andreas Glockner, 2012. "Focusing on what you own: Biased information uptake due to ownership," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 7(3), pages 254-267, May.
    9. Lior Fink & Daniele Papismedov, 2023. "On the Same Page? What Users Benefit from a Desktop View on Mobile Devices," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 423-441, June.
    10. Li, Qian & Huang, Zhuowei (Joy) & Christianson, Kiel, 2016. "Visual attention toward tourism photographs with text: An eye-tracking study," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 243-258.
    11. Yuri A. Markov & Igor S. Utochkin, 2017. "The Effect of Object Distinctiveness on Object-Location Binding in Visual Working Memory," HSE Working papers WP BRP 79/PSY/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    12. Carlo Baldassi & Simone Cerreia-Vioglio & Fabio Maccheroni & Massimo Marinacci & Marco Pirazzini, 2020. "A Behavioral Characterization of the Drift Diffusion Model and Its Multialternative Extension for Choice Under Time Pressure," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(11), pages 5075-5093, November.
    13. S. Cerreia-Vioglio & F. Maccheroni & M. Marinacci & A. Rustichini, 2017. "Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: inside and outside the black box," Working Papers 615, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    14. J David Timm & Frank Papenmeier, 2019. "Reorganization of spatial configurations in visual working memory: A matter of set size?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Simone Cerreia-Vioglio & Fabio Maccheroni & Massimo Marinacci, 2020. "Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: outside and inside the black box," Working Papers 663, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    16. Clark, Cameron M. & Lawlor-Savage, Linette & Goghari, Vina M., 2017. "Comparing brain activations associated with working memory and fluid intelligence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 66-77.
    17. Ociepka, Michał & Kałamała, Patrycja & Chuderski, Adam, 2022. "High individual alpha frequency brains run fast, but it does not make them smart," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    18. repec:cup:judgdm:v:7:y:2012:i:3:p:254-267 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Shaiyan Keshvari & Ronald van den Berg & Wei Ji Ma, 2013. "No Evidence for an Item Limit in Change Detection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-9, February.
    20. Gregor Hardiess & Kai Basten & Hanspeter A Mallot, 2011. "Acquisition vs. Memorization Trade-Offs Are Modulated by Walking Distance and Pattern Complexity in a Large-Scale Copying Paradigm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-11, April.
    21. Bin Zhu & Stephanie A. Watts, 2010. "Visualization of Network Concepts: The Impact of Working Memory Capacity Differences," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 327-344, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:158-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.