IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v106y2022icp254-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining multi-asset and intrinsic risk measures

Author

Listed:
  • Laudagé, Christian
  • Sass, Jörn
  • Wenzel, Jörg

Abstract

The risk of a future payoff is commonly quantified by calculating the costs of a hedging portfolio such that the resulting position is acceptable, i.e., that it passes a capital adequacy test. A multi-asset risk measure describes the minimal external capital which has to be raised into multiple eligible assets to make a future position acceptable. Recently, the alternative methodology of intrinsic risk measures was introduced in the literature. These ask for the minimal proportion of the financial position which has to be reallocated to pass the capital adequacy test, i.e., only internal capital is used.

Suggested Citation

  • Laudagé, Christian & Sass, Jörn & Wenzel, Jörg, 2022. "Combining multi-asset and intrinsic risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 254-269.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:106:y:2022:i:c:p:254-269
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2022.07.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668722000786
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2022.07.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Frittelli & Giacomo Scandolo, 2006. "Risk Measures And Capital Requirements For Processes," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(4), pages 589-612, October.
    2. Kreps, David M., 1981. "Arbitrage and equilibrium in economies with infinitely many commodities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 15-35, March.
    3. Walter Farkas & Alexander Smirnow, 2018. "Intrinsic Risk Measures," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Kathrin Glau & Daniël Linders & Aleksey Min & Matthias Scherer & Lorenz Schneider & Rudi Zagst (ed.), Innovations in Insurance, Risk- and Asset Management, chapter 7, pages 163-184, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Liebrich, Felix-Benedikt & Svindland, Gregor, 2017. "Model spaces for risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 150-165.
    5. Walter Farkas & Pablo Koch-Medina & Cosimo Munari, 2012. "Capital requirements with defaultable securities," Papers 1203.4610, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2014.
    6. Giacomo Scandolo, 2004. "Models of Capital Requirements in Static and Dynamic Settings," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 33(3), pages 415-435, November.
    7. Walter Farkas & Pablo Koch-Medina & Cosimo Munari, 2014. "Beyond cash-additive risk measures: when changing the numéraire fails," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 145-173, January.
    8. Michel Baes & Pablo Koch‐Medina & Cosimo Munari, 2020. "Existence, uniqueness, and stability of optimal payoffs of eligible assets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 128-166, January.
    9. Felix-Benedikt Liebrich & Gregor Svindland, 2019. "Risk sharing for capital requirements with multidimensional security markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 925-973, October.
    10. Artzner, Philippe & Delbaen, Freddy & Koch-Medina, Pablo, 2009. "Risk Measures and Efficient use of Capital 1," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 101-116, May.
    11. Farkas, Walter & Koch-Medina, Pablo & Munari, Cosimo, 2014. "Capital requirements with defaultable securities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 58-67.
    12. Alberto Floreani, 2013. "Risk Measures and Capital Requirements: A Critique of the Solvency II Approach," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 38(2), pages 189-212, April.
    13. Felix-Benedikt Liebrich & Gregor Svindland, 2017. "Model Spaces for Risk Measures," Papers 1703.01137, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2017.
    14. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    15. Goovaerts, Marc J. & Kaas, Rob & Laeven, Roger J.A., 2010. "Decision principles derived from risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 294-302, December.
    16. Damir Filipović & Gregor Svindland, 2008. "Optimal capital and risk allocations for law- and cash-invariant convex functions," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 423-439, July.
    17. Menahem E. Yaari, 1965. "Convexity in the Theory of Choice under Risk," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 79(2), pages 278-290.
    18. Walter Farkas & Pablo Koch-Medina & Cosimo Munari, 2012. "Beyond cash-additive risk measures: when changing the num\'{e}raire fails," Papers 1206.0478, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2014.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jana Hlavinova & Birgit Rudloff & Alexander Smirnow, 2023. "Set-valued intrinsic measures of systemic risk," Papers 2311.14588, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sascha Desmettre & Christian Laudagé & Jörn Sass, 2020. "Good-Deal Bounds for Option Prices under Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall Constraints," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Andreas H. Hamel & Frank Heyde, 2021. "Set-Valued T -Translative Functions and Their Applications in Finance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-33, September.
    3. Maria Arduca & Cosimo Munari, 2021. "Risk measures beyond frictionless markets," Papers 2111.08294, arXiv.org.
    4. W. Farkas & A. Smirnow, 2016. "Intrinsic risk measures," Papers 1610.08782, arXiv.org.
    5. Felix-Benedikt Liebrich & Gregor Svindland, 2018. "Risk sharing for capital requirements with multidimensional security markets," Papers 1809.10015, arXiv.org.
    6. Felix-Benedikt Liebrich & Gregor Svindland, 2019. "Risk sharing for capital requirements with multidimensional security markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 925-973, October.
    7. Pablo Koch-Medina & Santiago Moreno-Bromberg & Cosimo Munari, 2014. "Capital adequacy tests and limited liability of financial institutions," Papers 1401.3133, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2014.
    8. Xue Dong He & Xianhua Peng, 2017. "Surplus-Invariant, Law-Invariant, and Conic Acceptance Sets Must be the Sets Induced by Value-at-Risk," Papers 1707.05596, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2018.
    9. Cosimo Munari & Stefan Weber & Lutz Wilhelmy, 2023. "Capital requirements and claims recovery: A new perspective on solvency regulation," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 90(2), pages 329-380, June.
    10. Michel Baes & Pablo Koch-Medina & Cosimo Munari, 2017. "Existence, uniqueness and stability of optimal portfolios of eligible assets," Papers 1702.01936, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2017.
    11. Andreas H Hamel, 2018. "Monetary Measures of Risk," Papers 1812.04354, arXiv.org.
    12. Erio Castagnoli & Giacomo Cattelan & Fabio Maccheroni & Claudio Tebaldi & Ruodu Wang, 2021. "Star-shaped Risk Measures," Papers 2103.15790, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    13. Pablo Koch-Medina & Cosimo Munari & Gregor Svindland, 2016. "Which eligible assets are compatible with comonotonic capital requirements?," Papers 1602.05477, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    14. Fabio Bellini & Pablo Koch-Medina & Cosimo Munari & Gregor Svindland, 2018. "Law-invariant functionals on general spaces of random variables," Papers 1808.00821, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    15. Cosimo Munari, 2020. "Multi-utility representations of incomplete preferences induced by set-valued risk measures," Papers 2009.04151, arXiv.org.
    16. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2018. "Scalar multivariate risk measures with a single eligible asset," Papers 1807.10694, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    17. Shengzhong Chen & Niushan Gao & Denny Leung & Lei Li, 2021. "Automatic Fatou Property of Law-invariant Risk Measures," Papers 2107.08109, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    18. Maria Arduca & Cosimo Munari, 2020. "Fundamental theorem of asset pricing with acceptable risk in markets with frictions," Papers 2012.08351, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    19. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2018. "Time consistency for scalar multivariate risk measures," Papers 1810.04978, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    20. Michel Baes & Cosimo Munari, 2020. "A continuous selection for optimal portfolios under convex risk measures does not always exist," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 91(1), pages 5-23, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Intrinsic risk measure; Multi-asset risk measure; Multiple eligible assets; Diversification; Expected Shortfall;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C65 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Miscellaneous Mathematical Tools
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:106:y:2022:i:c:p:254-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.