IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v105y2022icp96-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuation of guaranteed minimum maturity benefits under generalised regime-switching models using the Fourier Cosine method

Author

Listed:
  • Kang, Boda
  • Shen, Yang
  • Zhu, Dan
  • Ziveyi, Jonathan

Abstract

This paper presents a flexible valuation approach for variable annuity (VA) contracts embedded with guaranteed minimum maturity benefit (GMMB) riders written on an underlying fund that evolves according to a general regime-switching framework. Unlike the classical regime-switching models which only allow model parameters to change upon regime switches, our framework allows, more importantly, model structures to vary. With mild assumptions on the characteristic function of the log-stock price, our model settings enable the study of fundamental features of the market dynamics, such as stochastic volatility and jumps, on the underlying fund value of GMMB in a unified framework. This novel idea is illustrated by a three-regime model whose environments can be characterised by either the geometric Brownian motion process, the Heston (1993) stochastic volatility process, or double exponential process. Three versions of the GMMB riders are considered; a fixed or roll-up guarantee, a geometric average guarantee and a ratchet guarantee. With the Fourier Cosine (COS) method which utilises characteristic functions, explicit valuation expressions for various contracts are derived, and numerical illustrations are performed to analyse the efficiency of the approach in terms of computational speed and accuracy. The paper makes a unique contribution by presenting regime-dependent bounds and an algorithm for determining the optimal grid points required for the COS method to achieve a specific level of accuracy. Numerical experiments for the valuation framework reveal that i) as the likelihood of regime shifts increases, the price difference of VA contracts with different initial regimes diminishes, which is consistent with financial intuition; ii) the generalised regime-switching models are more suitable for VA pricing when the time-to-maturity spans over several decades, during which structural changes, although infrequent, are inevitable.

Suggested Citation

  • Kang, Boda & Shen, Yang & Zhu, Dan & Ziveyi, Jonathan, 2022. "Valuation of guaranteed minimum maturity benefits under generalised regime-switching models using the Fourier Cosine method," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 96-127.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:105:y:2022:i:c:p:96-127
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2022.03.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668722000397
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2022.03.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fontana, Claudio & Rotondi, Francesco, 2023. "Valuation of general GMWB annuities in a low interest rate environment," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 142-167.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Variable annuity contracts; GMMB; COS method; Generalised regime-switching model; Ratchet options;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:105:y:2022:i:c:p:96-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.