IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v133y2023ics0168851023001021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Was priority setting included in the Canadian COVID-19 pandemic planning and preparedness? A comparative analysis of COVID-19 pandemic plans from eight provinces and three territories

Author

Listed:
  • Kapiriri, Lydia
  • Essue, Beverley M.
  • Velez, Claudia M.
  • Julia, Abelson
  • Elysee, Nouvet
  • Bernardo, Aguilera
  • Marion, Danis
  • Susan, Goold
  • Ieystn, Williams

Abstract

Variation in priorities during pandemic planning among the federal, provincial and territorial jurisdictions are thought to have impacted Canada's ability to effectively control the spread of the COVID-19 virus, and protect the most vulnerable. The potential influence of diverse and divergent political, cultural, and behavioural factors, regarding inclusion of priority setting (PS) in pandemic preparedness planning across the country is not well understood. This study aimed to examine how the Canadian federal, provincial and territorial COVID-19 pandemic preparedness planning documents integrated PS.

Suggested Citation

  • Kapiriri, Lydia & Essue, Beverley M. & Velez, Claudia M. & Julia, Abelson & Elysee, Nouvet & Bernardo, Aguilera & Marion, Danis & Susan, Goold & Ieystn, Williams, 2023. "Was priority setting included in the Canadian COVID-19 pandemic planning and preparedness? A comparative analysis of COVID-19 pandemic plans from eight provinces and three territories," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:133:y:2023:i:c:s0168851023001021
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851023001021
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104817?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smith, Neale & Mitton, Craig & Hall, William & Bryan, Stirling & Donaldson, Cam & Peacock, Stuart & Gibson, Jennifer L. & Urquhart, Bonnie, 2016. "High performance in healthcare priority setting and resource allocation: A literature- and case study-based framework in the Canadian context," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 185-192.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coast, Joanna, 2018. "A history that goes hand in hand: Reflections on the development of health economics and the role played by Social Science & Medicine, 1967–2017," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 227-232.
    2. Jinxia Zhu & Qian Xu & Yi Pan & Lefeng Qiu & Yi Peng & Haijun Bao, 2018. "Land-Acquisition and Resettlement (LAR) Conflicts: A Perspective of Spatial Injustice of Urban Public Resources Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Ahumada-Canale, Antonio & Jeet, Varinder & Bilgrami, Anam & Seil, Elizabeth & Gu, Yuanyuan & Cutler, Henry, 2023. "Barriers and facilitators to implementing priority setting and resource allocation tools in hospital decisions: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    4. Min Weng & Tingting Liu & Mengjun Kang, 2017. "Liver cancer mapping based on actual medical treatment choices," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 124-129, January.
    5. Uddin, Shahzad & Mori, Yuji & Shahadat, Khandakar, 2020. "Private management and governance styles in a Japanese public hospital: A story of west meets east," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    6. Williams, Iestyn & Allen, Kerry & Plahe, Gunveer, 2019. "Reports of rationing from the neglected realm of capital investment: Responses to resource constraint in the English National Health Service," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 1-8.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:133:y:2023:i:c:s0168851023001021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.