IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v126y2022i7p643-651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends in hastened death decision criteria: A review of official reports

Author

Listed:
  • Marina, Sílvia
  • Wainwright, Tony
  • Pereira, Helena P.
  • Ricou, Miguel

Abstract

Voluntary euthanasia and physician assisted suicide has been legally performed in several countries. However, little is known about how decision-making occurs. We undertook this study to describe trends in officially reported cases of voluntary euthanasia or physician assisted suicide and to explore the decision-making procedures and understand relevant criteria. Thematic analysis of the official reports from several countries was performed. Differences in the number of reported deaths from hasten death practices between countries was found, with higher numbers in countries who performed voluntary euthanasia. Patients profiles follow the trends in the literature (the majority is aged between 70 and 89 years old, men die more often than women in most countries, most prevalent underlying disease is cancer, most people died at home). Despite there being little detail in the reports, decision is explored in the majority of countries and states (exploration of acceptable alternatives and verification of the voluntariness of the request). The importance of collecting data on this topic around the world and establishing a firm evidence-base to support professionals’ practice is highlighted.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina, Sílvia & Wainwright, Tony & Pereira, Helena P. & Ricou, Miguel, 2022. "Trends in hastened death decision criteria: A review of official reports," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(7), pages 643-651.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:126:y:2022:i:7:p:643-651
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851022001038
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Li Way, 2010. "The Oregon Paradox," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 204-208, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:126:y:2022:i:7:p:643-651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.