IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v121y2017i6p675-682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gatekeeping and the utilization of physician services in France: Evidence on the Médecin traitant reform

Author

Listed:
  • Dumontet, Magali
  • Buchmueller, Thomas
  • Dourgnon, Paul
  • Jusot, Florence
  • Wittwer, Jérôme

Abstract

In 2005, France implemented a gatekeeping reform designed to improve care coordination and to reduce utilization of specialists’ services. Under this policy, patients designate a médecin traitant, typically a general practitioner, who will be their first point of contact during an episode of care and who will provide referrals to specialists. A key element of the policy is that patients who self-refer to a specialist face higher cost sharing than if they received a referral from their médecin traitant. We consider the effect of this policy on the utilization of physician services. Our analysis of administrative claims data spanning the years 2000–2008 indicates that visits to specialists, which were increasing in the years prior to the implementation of the reform, fell after the policy was in place. Additional evidence from the administrative claims as well as survey data suggest that this decline arose from a reduction in self-referrals, which is consistent with the objectives of the policy. Visits fell significantly both for specialties targeted by the policy and specialties for which self-referrals are still allowed for certain treatments. This apparent spillover effect may suggest that, at least initially, patients did not understand the subtleties of the policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Dumontet, Magali & Buchmueller, Thomas & Dourgnon, Paul & Jusot, Florence & Wittwer, Jérôme, 2017. "Gatekeeping and the utilization of physician services in France: Evidence on the Médecin traitant reform," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(6), pages 675-682.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:121:y:2017:i:6:p:675-682
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.04.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016885101730115X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:fru:finjrn:180305:p:64-77 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:121:y:2017:i:6:p:675-682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu) or (). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.