IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v13y2011i7p513-519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green accounting for forest and green policies in China -- A pilot national assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Ying, Zhang
  • Gao, Minxue
  • Liu, Junchang
  • Wen, Yali
  • Song, Weimin

Abstract

Green accounting is a debated issue. This pilot study for the first time estimates the values of China's forest resources and calculates its forest green GDP. It relies primarily on existing data on previously published information by the government in China. Our estimates indicate that the total stock value of forestlands and standing timber in 1999 was 4564.43Â billion Yuan (RMB) in China, in 2003 was 5273.05Â billion Yuan, and the sum of flow values of forest resources from 1999 to 2003 was 11,072.36Â billion Yuan annually. In the value of forest ecological services, the value of water conservation was largest, and the value of air pollution and dust purifying was least. The nation's eaGDP (environmentally adjusted GDP) for forest in 1999 was 9281.55Â billion Yuan, Larger than GDP of 8967.71Â billion Yuan, the eaNDP (environmentally adjusted NDP) for forest was 9280.73Â billion Yuan, was about 1.05 times that of the NDP. In 2003 both of the eaGDP and eaNDP for forest calculated by the production method at the marketing price exceeded the conventional GDP and NDP, but the annual average growth rate of eaNDP for forest was 10.68%, less than the annual average growth rate of NDP 11.27% during the accounting period, which mostly caused by the increased depreciation value of the planted forest, and the loss of forest resource assets and degradation of forest environment assets since the greater economic development in recent years in China. We propose that forest compensation should be enhanced, and the legal protection of forests should be strengthened, as well as the economic activities which cause deterioration in forest service functions should be avoided or at least minimized.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying, Zhang & Gao, Minxue & Liu, Junchang & Wen, Yali & Song, Weimin, 2011. "Green accounting for forest and green policies in China -- A pilot national assessment," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(7), pages 513-519, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:13:y:2011:i:7:p:513-519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934111000852
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. David Klemperer, 1989. "An Income Tax Wedge between Buyers' and Sellers' Values of Forests," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 65(2), pages 146-157.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amer Shakkour & Hamza Alaodat & Emad Alqisi & Ali Alghazawi, 2018. "The Role of Environmental Accounting in Sustainable Development. Empirical Study," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 1-5.
    2. Nhem, Sareth & Lee, Young Jin, 2019. "Using Q methodology to investigate the views of local experts on the sustainability of community-based forestry in Oddar Meanchey province, Cambodia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Chenyang Xue & Chaofeng Shao & Junli Gao, 2020. "Ecological Compensation Strategy for SDG-Based Basin-Type National Parks: A Case Study of the Baoxing Giant Panda National Park," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Chen, Jiandong & Wu, Yinyin & Song, Malin & Zhu, Zunhong, 2017. "Stochastic frontier analysis of productive efficiency in China's Forestry Industry," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 87-95.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Newman, D.H., 2002. "Forestry's golden rule and the development of the optimal forest rotation literature," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 5-27.
    2. Greene, John L. & Butler, Brett J. & Catanzaro, Paul F. & Hewes, Jaketon H. & Kilgore, Michael A. & Kittredge, David B. & Ma, Zhao & Tyrrell, Mary L., 2014. "Family forest owners and federal taxes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 219-226.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:13:y:2011:i:7:p:513-519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.