IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v94y2026ics1544612326001625.html

Similarity failure proximity score: A network-based metric for bankruptcy prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Papíková, Lenka
  • Papík, Mário

Abstract

This study proposes the Similarity Failure Proximity Score (SFPS), a network-based metric that improves bankruptcy risk identification by capturing a company’s governance-linked proximity to bankrupt companies. SFPS translates relational structure in board-interlock networks into company-level failure proximity scores, reflecting structural similarity to bankruptcy-prone companies in the governance network. Using Slovak company data from 2016 to 2023 and annual corporate governance networks, we show that SFPS consistently enhances out-of-sample bankruptcy discrimination across seven machine learning classifiers, outperforming benchmarks based on financial ratios, non-financial variables, classical network measures, and uniform proximity proxies. The economic value of SFPS is operational: it provides a rankable early-warning signal for banks, regulators, and credit analysts. By targeting screening, monitoring, and intervention toward companies structurally close to bankrupt companies that standard accounting indicators may miss, SFPS can help reduce monitoring costs and expected credit losses. This is particularly relevant in low-transparency, governance-intensive environments where financial reporting can be delayed or incomplete and where distress may propagate through shared decision-makers. Results are robust across alternative similarity specifications and across director-centric and company-only network constructions. Overall, SFPS contributes to network-informed risk models by exposing latent vulnerabilities that complement Basel-aligned and financial-ratio-based approaches in credit screening and systemic oversight.

Suggested Citation

  • Papíková, Lenka & Papík, Mário, 2026. "Similarity failure proximity score: A network-based metric for bankruptcy prediction," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:94:y:2026:i:c:s1544612326001625
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2026.109631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612326001625
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2026.109631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • C55 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis
    • G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation
    • L14 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:94:y:2026:i:c:s1544612326001625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.