IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v27y2009i6p456-466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The contingent nature of best practices in national competitiveness: The case of American and Japanese innovation processes

Author

Listed:
  • Pudelko, Markus
  • Mendenhall, Mark E.

Abstract

Summary We propose that the differences in competitiveness of companies from different countries is not just a question of the adoption of 'better' management models, as conventional wisdom would have us believe; rather, we contend that national competitiveness can change radically over time without significant changes in management practices. Contrary to much of the management literature we hold that changes in the global business environment often determine to a large degree the competitiveness of companies. Based on our assumptions we offer four specific lessons of how companies can increase their competitiveness within the constraints of the socio-cultural context in which they operate.

Suggested Citation

  • Pudelko, Markus & Mendenhall, Mark E., 2009. "The contingent nature of best practices in national competitiveness: The case of American and Japanese innovation processes," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 456-466, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:27:y:2009:i:6:p:456-466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237308001254
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne-Wil Harzing & Markus Pudelko, 2016. "Do We Need to Distance Ourselves from the Distance Concept? Why Home and Host Country Context Might Matter More Than (Cultural) Distance," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 1-34, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:27:y:2009:i:6:p:456-466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.