IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v34y2011i2p105-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of an evidence-based modified therapeutic community: Staff and resident perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Tuchman, Ellen
  • Sarasohn, M. Kim

Abstract

The widespread successful implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) into community substance abuse settings require a thorough understanding of practitioner and client attitudes toward these approaches. This paper presents the first that we know of a qualitative study that explores staff and resident experience of the change process of a therapeutic community to an evidence-based modified therapeutic community for homeless individuals with co-occurring substance abuse and mental illness disorders. The sample consists of 20 participants; 10 staff and 10 residents. Interviews were conducted at the agency, recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were organized and coded from a grounded theory perspective. Themes and patterns of staff and resident experience were identified. The change in program structure from TC to MTC were perceived by staff as efforts to accommodate the particular needs of the homeless individuals with mental and substance abuse disorders and feeling they were inadequately prepared with inadequate resources to facilitate a successful transition. Participant descriptions were described in terms of loss of structure, loss of peers and being helped. Findings have potential to shape implementation of evidence-based practices in community substance abuse treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuchman, Ellen & Sarasohn, M. Kim, 2011. "Implementation of an evidence-based modified therapeutic community: Staff and resident perspectives," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 105-112, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:34:y:2011:i:2:p:105-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149-7189(10)00066-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Crea, Thomas M. & Crampton, David S., 2011. "The context of program implementation and evaluation: A pilot study of interorganizational differences to improve child welfare reform efforts," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2273-2281.
    2. Manchester, Julianne & Gray-Miceli, Deanna L. & Metcalf, Judith A. & Paolini, Charlotte A. & Napier, Anne H. & Coogle, Constance L. & Owens, Myra G., 2014. "Facilitating Lewin's change model with collaborative evaluation in promoting evidence based practices of health professionals," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 82-90.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:34:y:2011:i:2:p:105-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.