IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v103y2024ics0149718923001751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engaging stakeholders to retrospectively discern implementation strategies to support program evaluation: Proposed method and case study

Author

Listed:
  • Painter, Jacob T.
  • Raciborski, Rebecca A.
  • Matthieu, Monica M.
  • Oliver, Ciara M.
  • Adkins, David A.
  • Garner, Kimberly K.

Abstract

Availability of evidence-based practices (EBPs) is critical for improving health care outcomes, but diffusion can be challenging. Implementation activities increase the adoption of EBPs and support sustainability. However, when implementation activities are a part of quality improvement processes, evaluation of the time and cost associated with these activities is challenged by the need for a correct classification of these activities to a known taxonomy of implementation strategies by implementation actors.

Suggested Citation

  • Painter, Jacob T. & Raciborski, Rebecca A. & Matthieu, Monica M. & Oliver, Ciara M. & Adkins, David A. & Garner, Kimberly K., 2024. "Engaging stakeholders to retrospectively discern implementation strategies to support program evaluation: Proposed method and case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:103:y:2024:i:c:s0149718923001751
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718923001751
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102398?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:103:y:2024:i:c:s0149718923001751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.