IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enscpo/v68y2017icp58-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy modelling to identify key drivers of ecological water quality to support decision and policy making

Author

Listed:
  • Forio, Marie Anne Eurie
  • Mouton, Ans
  • Lock, Koen
  • Boets, Pieter
  • Nguyen, Thi Hanh Tien
  • Damanik Ambarita, Minar Naomi
  • Musonge, Peace Liz Sasha
  • Dominguez-Granda, Luis
  • Goethals, Peter L.M.

Abstract

Water quality modelling is an effective tool to investigate, describe and predict the ecological state of an aquatic ecosystem. Various environmental variables may simultaneously affect water quality. Appropriate selection of a limited number of key-variables facilitates cost-effective management of water resources. This paper aims to determine (and analyse the effect of) the major environmental variables predicting ecological water quality through the application of fuzzy models. In this study, a fuzzy logic methodology, previously applied to predict species distributions, was extended to model environmental effects on a whole community. In a second step, the developed models were applied in a more general water management context to support decision and policy making. A hill-climbing optimisation algorithm was applied to relate ecological water quality and environmental variables to the community indicator. The optimal model was selected based on the predictive performance (Cohen’s Kappa), ecological relevance and model’s interpretability. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis was performed as an extra element to analyse and evaluate the optimal model. The optimal model included the variables land use, chlorophyll and flow velocity. The variable selection method and sensitivity analysis indicated that land use influences ecological water quality the most and that it affects the effect of other variables on water quality to a high extent. The model outcome can support spatial planning related to land use in river basins and policy making related to flows and water quality standards. Fuzzy models are transparent to a wide range of users and therefore may stimulate communication between modellers, river managers, policy makers and stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Forio, Marie Anne Eurie & Mouton, Ans & Lock, Koen & Boets, Pieter & Nguyen, Thi Hanh Tien & Damanik Ambarita, Minar Naomi & Musonge, Peace Liz Sasha & Dominguez-Granda, Luis & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2017. "Fuzzy modelling to identify key drivers of ecological water quality to support decision and policy making," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 58-68.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:68:y:2017:i:c:p:58-68
    DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901116308917
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roghayeh Sadeghi Pasvisheh & Marie Anne Eurie Forio & Long Tuan Ho & Peter L. M. Goethals, 2021. "Evidence-Based Management of the Anzali Wetland System (Northern Iran) Based on Innovative Monitoring and Modeling Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Jawad Ghafoor & Marie Anne Eurie Forio & Peter L. M. Goethals, 2022. "Spatially Explicit River Basin Models for Cost-Benefit Analyses to Optimize Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:68:y:2017:i:c:p:58-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-science-and-policy/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.