IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v29y2004i9p1599-1609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geologic storage of CO2 from refining and chemical facilities in the midwestern US

Author

Listed:
  • Gupta, Neeraj
  • Sass, Bruce
  • Chattopadhyay, Sandip
  • Sminchak, Joel
  • Wang, Peng
  • Espie, Tony

Abstract

Three locations in the midwestern US were evaluated for saline reservoir sequestration of CO2 transported from refineries and chemical plants along existing pipeline rights-of-way. Based on formation volume calculations, the potential storage capacity in a single formation (the Mt. Simon Sandstone) is in the range of several billion tons. Compositional reservoir simulations using single-well radial models were completed to predict the formation pressures, CO2 spreading, and dissolution following injection. Injectivity at all sites appears to be sufficient for more than 1 Mt/year/well of CO2 without exceeding the fracture pressure limits, and no leakage of CO2 into shallower horizons was predicted. A horizontal injection well scenario showed a smaller increase in reservoir pressure than vertical wells. The geochemical evaluation included a summary of the brine chemistry and mineralogy of the reservoir and caprock formations. Equilibrium geochemical simulations for several scenarios did not indicate any adverse reactions as a result of CO2 injection. A preliminary economic and engineering assessment of several injection scenarios showed that the cost of CO2 dehydration, compression, transport, and injection is nearly $ 20/t, excluding capture costs. The largest capital cost is compression and pipeline systems, and the largest operational cost is compression. System costs may be reduced by optimizing the location of storage reservoirs closer to the emission sources or through development of a regional shared transport network and storage site.

Suggested Citation

  • Gupta, Neeraj & Sass, Bruce & Chattopadhyay, Sandip & Sminchak, Joel & Wang, Peng & Espie, Tony, 2004. "Geologic storage of CO2 from refining and chemical facilities in the midwestern US," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1599-1609.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:29:y:2004:i:9:p:1599-1609
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544204001446
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rashid Mohamed Mkemai & Gong Bin, 0. "A modeling and numerical simulation study of enhanced CO2 sequestration into deep saline formation: a strategy towards climate change mitigation," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 901-927.
    2. Newcomer, Adam & Apt, Jay, 2008. "Implications of generator siting for CO2 pipeline infrastructure," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1776-1787, May.
    3. Rashid Mohamed Mkemai & Gong Bin, 2020. "A modeling and numerical simulation study of enhanced CO2 sequestration into deep saline formation: a strategy towards climate change mitigation," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 901-927, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:29:y:2004:i:9:p:1599-1609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.