IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v292y2024ics0360544224004055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Speciation distributions and risk assessments of trace elements in sludge and coal co-combustion ash

Author

Listed:
  • Wei, Daining
  • Han, Huawei
  • Zhu, Zhaoyang
  • Wu, Jiawen
  • Wang, Tao
  • Sun, Baomin

Abstract

The co-combustion of sludge and coal has advantages such as utilizing the energy in sludge and reducing the treatment difficulty of sludge ash. Due to a wide source of sewage, the distributions of trace elements in co-combustion ash may differ from coal ash. Under laboratory conditions, the study examined the speciation distribution by the BCR method and evaluated the environmental risks and health risks of six typical trace elements in the co-combustion ash of sludge and coal. There is a significant difference in trace elements between sludge ash and coal ash, the highest content of heavy metals in coal ash and sludge ash is chromium (141.4 mg/kg) and zinc (1455.4 mg/kg), respectively. Coal ash has a lower heavy metal content and effective fraction than sludge ash, and coal ash is more stable. Risk assessment code analysis shows that most elements in co-combustion ash are at the low risk level, and when the blending ratio reaches 50%, chromium is at the medium risk level. According to Nemerow pollution index, cadmium can cause pollution to the environment when pH < 7.5. The risk of heavy metals in co-combustion ash on human health is at the acceptable level.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei, Daining & Han, Huawei & Zhu, Zhaoyang & Wu, Jiawen & Wang, Tao & Sun, Baomin, 2024. "Speciation distributions and risk assessments of trace elements in sludge and coal co-combustion ash," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:292:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224004055
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224004055
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:292:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224004055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.