IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v38y2010i1p99-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of a multi-criteria analysis for the selection of the most suitable energy source and water desalination system in Mauritania

Author

Listed:
  • Bayod Rújula, Angel Antonio
  • Dia, Nourou Khalidou

Abstract

Water deficits and their associated shortages are serious problems in many areas of the world. The paper presents a multi-criteria analysis for selection of the most suitable system in Mauritania. Six scenarios, different energy sources, technologies of water desalination processes and water use and five criteria are analyzed. The multi-criteria analysis shows that the optimal solution is different for each scenario; in some cases the photovoltaic-reverse osmosis option is preferable; in others, the best option is reverse-osmosis powered by wind energy or concentrating solar parabolic.

Suggested Citation

  • Bayod Rújula, Angel Antonio & Dia, Nourou Khalidou, 2010. "Application of a multi-criteria analysis for the selection of the most suitable energy source and water desalination system in Mauritania," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 99-115, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:38:y:2010:i:1:p:99-115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301-4215(09)00645-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:eee:rensus:v:74:y:2017:i:c:p:1189-1209 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Desalination Renewable Scenarios;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:38:y:2010:i:1:p:99-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.