IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v158y2026ics0140988326002148.html

Do intentions matter in household solar panel adoption? New evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Best, Rohan
  • Jayasinghe, Maneka
  • Mallick, Sushanta
  • Mukhopadhaya, Pundarik

Abstract

While intentions are likely to play an important role in household solar-panel adoption, most research usually considers intentions and actual adoption separately, creating uncertainty for equitable policy design. Using the UK Household Longitudinal Study, we examine the link between stated intentions and actual adoption. We implement a multinomial logit framework and combine this with matching methods to compare observationally similar households across intention categories. We find that 90% of households who had seriously considered adopting solar panels by 2012–13 had not adopted by 2021–22. Interestingly, households who initially rejected solar-panel adoption after consideration by 2012–13 were more likely adopters by 2021–22, compared to those who had not considered adoption at all. Despite these nuances, solar intentions (proxied by serious consideration) exert a robust positive effect on actual adoption, increasing the likelihood by three to seven percentage points – larger than commonly assessed variables such as income or climate perceptions, which each contribute zero to two percentage points. Moreover, the influence of solar intentions is largely consistent across income groups. Decomposition analysis further reveals that modest income effects are largely attributable to correlated factors such as renting status and age. These findings suggest that policy design uncertainty can be reduced by carefully eliciting household intentions, particularly among younger households, rather than relying solely on income-based eligibility thresholds for targeting energy policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Best, Rohan & Jayasinghe, Maneka & Mallick, Sushanta & Mukhopadhaya, Pundarik, 2026. "Do intentions matter in household solar panel adoption? New evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:158:y:2026:i:c:s0140988326002148
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988326002148
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109335?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance
    • D15 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Intertemporal Household Choice; Life Cycle Models and Saving
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:158:y:2026:i:c:s0140988326002148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.