IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v154y2026ics0140988326000174.html

When carbon policy meets sulfur policy: How environmental policy portfolios enhance green productivity in Chinese cities

Author

Listed:
  • Tan, Bin
  • Zhang, Ning

Abstract

Focusing on the intersection of carbon and sulfur control policies in Chinese cities, the effect of coupled environmental regulations on green productivity is examined in this study. We exploit a quasi-natural experiment from 2006 to 2019, using the Low-Carbon City Pilot (LCCP) program in conjunction with sulfur dioxide (SO2) reduction mandates. Employing the difference-in-differences (DID) technique, we discover that the LCCP program results in a 3.5% improvement in green productivity. Approximately half of this effect is attributable to the SO2 reduction targets. These results underscore the importance of policy interaction in shaping environmental and economic outcomes. Mechanism analysis reveals heterogeneous transmission channels. The LCCP program improves green productivity primarily by reducing energy input. In contrast, SO2 reduction targets are more effective in promoting end-of-pipe pollution control technologies. Importantly, the joint policy implementation does not hinder economic growth. Our findings contribute to the literature on environmental policy design under multi-pollutant frameworks. In the context of China's carbon neutrality agenda, they highlight the value of coordinated policy portfolios.

Suggested Citation

  • Tan, Bin & Zhang, Ning, 2026. "When carbon policy meets sulfur policy: How environmental policy portfolios enhance green productivity in Chinese cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:154:y:2026:i:c:s0140988326000174
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988326000174
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:154:y:2026:i:c:s0140988326000174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.