IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v148y2025ics0140988325005249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From coal to clean energy: Economic and environmental determinants of household energy transition in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Hadasik, Bartłomiej
  • Kubiczek, Jakub
  • Ryczko, Aleksandra
  • Krawczyńska, Dominika
  • Przedworska, Kornelia

Abstract

Energy transition emerges as a central theme in striving for sustainable development. International initiatives are launched, with countries pledging to meet specific transformation objectives. As an EU member, Poland has committed to several initiatives, including the “Fit for 55” package, yet faces inefficiency in its energy transition efforts. Recognizing the diverse social priorities, justice considerations, and cultural influences is essential for designing effective and equitable energy transition strategies that benefit both society and the environment. This article aims to identify the factors of energy transition in Polish households, with particular emphasis on economic and environmental determinants, and to compare their impact on consumer green decisions. This was achieved based on the results of a survey conducted in December 2023 using the CAWI technique on a sample of 1642 Poles, quota-sampled, to reflect the socio-demographic characteristics of the Polish population. The findings reveal that Poles prioritize economic factors, notably initial investment and operating costs, over environmental considerations when selecting an energy source in their households. Additionally, the overwhelming majority who have embarked on an energy transition did not do so driven solely by environmental motives. Possessing pro-environmental attitudes and knowledge increases the inclination to choose renewable energy sources (RES). Individuals who have undergone the transition are characterized by a higher average level of satisfaction with their energy source. The main source of inefficiency in Poland's energy transition process does not lie in a lack of environmental concern among the population but in unmet economic expectations. This issue arises from the ineffective allocation and use of financial support for the transition, coupled with the fact that individuals using RES do not experience lower bills in comparison to those who do not use RES.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadasik, Bartłomiej & Kubiczek, Jakub & Ryczko, Aleksandra & Krawczyńska, Dominika & Przedworska, Kornelia, 2025. "From coal to clean energy: Economic and environmental determinants of household energy transition in Poland," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:148:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325005249
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325005249
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108697?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:148:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325005249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.