IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v147y2025ics0140988325003834.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The “pink tax” for solar panels: Financial returns on solar investments by gender in Los Angeles, California

Author

Listed:
  • Pereira, Rui
  • O'Connell, Timmy

Abstract

Residential solar photovoltaic (PV) systems have become increasingly common in the United States. However, there have been gender, racial and socioeconomic disparities in both the adoption of and returns from investments in solar PV. This paper examines the “pink tax” for solar panels by examining gender-based differences in the financial returns for residential rooftop solar installations using a cash flow model for Los Angeles, CA matched to socioeconomic and demographic data from the Census Bureau. The analysis shows that women tend to see lower rates of return on investment in solar PV systems stemming, in part, from higher costs paid for these systems per watt installed. There is also evidence that women tend to be sold larger systems which can generate a more significant financial burden for systems with a lower rate of return.

Suggested Citation

  • Pereira, Rui & O'Connell, Timmy, 2025. "The “pink tax” for solar panels: Financial returns on solar investments by gender in Los Angeles, California," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:147:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325003834
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325003834
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108559?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Rooftop solar; Equity; Gender; Household finance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:147:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325003834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.