IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v328y2026i3p938-945.html

Efficiency analysis of natural cardinal ranking vectors for pairwise comparisons and the universal efficiency of the Perron geometric mean

Author

Listed:
  • Furtado, Susana
  • Johnson, Charles R.

Abstract

In models using pairwise (ratio) comparisons among alternatives, a cardinal ranking vector should be deduced from a reciprocal matrix. The right Perron eigenvector (RP) was traditionally used, though several other options have emerged. We consider some alternatives, namely the entry-wise reciprocal of the left Perron vector (LP), the left singular vector (LS), the entry-wise reciprocal of the right singular vector (RS), the arithmetic and geometric means of RP and LP (AP and GP), and of LS and RS (AS and GS). All eight of these vectors produce the natural vector in the consistent case. We compare them empirically, in terms of frequency of efficiency, for random reciprocal matrices, as a function of the number of alternatives. The vector GP is proved to be universally efficient. This provides a new proposal for the cardinal ranking vector. The vector GS performs better than the remaining six vectors, though all of them have a high frequency of efficiency. We show that, for reciprocal matrices obtained from consistent matrices by modifying one column and the corresponding row, all eight vectors are efficient. Moreover, the cone generated by the columns is efficient. This class of matrices includes a type of double perturbed consistent matrices, that is, reciprocal matrices obtained from consistent ones by modifying two pairs of symmetrically located entries. We also show the efficiency of the studied vectors for the double perturbed consistent matrices that are not column perturbed.

Suggested Citation

  • Furtado, Susana & Johnson, Charles R., 2026. "Efficiency analysis of natural cardinal ranking vectors for pairwise comparisons and the universal efficiency of the Perron geometric mean," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(3), pages 938-945.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:328:y:2026:i:3:p:938-945
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.07.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725005387
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.07.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessio Ishizaka & Markus Lusti, 2006. "How to derive priorities in AHP: a comparative study," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 14(4), pages 387-400, December.
    2. Fernandes, Rosário & Furtado, Susana, 2022. "Efficiency of the principal eigenvector of some triple perturbed consistent matrices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 1007-1015.
    3. Csató, László, 2019. "A characterization of the Logarithmic Least Squares Method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 212-216.
    4. Furtado, Susana & Johnson, Charles R., 2024. "Efficiency analysis for the Perron vector of a reciprocal matrix," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 480(C).
    5. Csató, László & Petróczy, Dóra Gréta, 2021. "On the monotonicity of the eigenvector method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(1), pages 230-237.
    6. Golany, B. & Kress, M., 1993. "A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matrices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 210-220, September.
    7. Gass, S. I. & Rapcsak, T., 2004. "Singular value decomposition in AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(3), pages 573-584, May.
    8. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    9. Susana Furtado & Charles R. Johnson, 2024. "Efficient vectors in priority setting methodology," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 332(1), pages 743-764, January.
    10. Kristóf Ábele-Nagy & Sándor Bozóki & Örs Rebák, 2018. "Efficiency analysis of double perturbed pairwise comparison matrices," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(5), pages 707-713, May.
    11. Csató, László, 2024. "Right-left asymmetry of the eigenvector method: A simulation study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 708-717.
    12. R. Blanquero & E. Carrizosa & E. Conde, 2006. "Inferring Efficient Weights from Pairwise Comparison Matrices," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 64(2), pages 271-284, October.
    13. Zsombor Szádoczki & Sándor Bozóki & Patrik Juhász & Sergii V. Kadenko & Vitaliy Tsyganok, 2023. "Incomplete pairwise comparison matrices based on graphs with average degree approximately 3," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 783-807, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susana Furtado & Charles R. Johnson, 2024. "Efficient vectors in priority setting methodology," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 332(1), pages 743-764, January.
    2. Furtado, Susana & Johnson, Charles R., 2024. "Efficiency analysis for the Perron vector of a reciprocal matrix," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 480(C).
    3. Csató, László, 2024. "Right-left asymmetry of the eigenvector method: A simulation study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 708-717.
    4. Shunsuke Shiraishi & Tsuneshi Obata, 2025. "Calculating Maximum Eigenvalues in Pairwise Comparison Matrices for the Analytic Hierarchy Process," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Fernandes, Rosário & Furtado, Susana, 2022. "Efficiency of the principal eigenvector of some triple perturbed consistent matrices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 1007-1015.
    6. József Temesi, 2011. "Pairwise comparison matrices and the error-free property of the decision maker," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 19(2), pages 239-249, June.
    7. Jiancheng Tu & Zhibin Wu, 2025. "Analytic hierarchy process rank reversals: causes and solutions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(2), pages 1785-1809, March.
    8. Kou, Gang & Lin, Changsheng, 2014. "A cosine maximization method for the priority vector derivation in AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 225-232.
    9. Yejun Xu & Dayong Wang, 2024. "Some methods to derive the priority weights from the best–worst method matrix and weight efficiency test in view of incomplete pairwise comparison matrix," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 31-62, March.
    10. Susana Furtado & Charles R. Johnson, 2026. "Best matrix interval for consistent matrices approximating a given reciprocal matrix," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 358(3), pages 1199-1218, March.
    11. László Csató & Kolos Csaba Ágoston & Sándor Bozóki, 2024. "On the coincidence of optimal completions for small pairwise comparison matrices with missing entries," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 333(1), pages 239-247, February.
    12. Pietro Amenta & Alessio Ishizaka & Antonio Lucadamo & Gabriella Marcarelli & Vijay Vyas, 2020. "Computing a common preference vector in a complex multi-actor and multi-group decision system in Analytic Hierarchy Process context," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 284(1), pages 33-62, January.
    13. Liu, Fang & Zou, Shu-Cai & Li, Qing, 2020. "Deriving priorities from pairwise comparison matrices with a novel consistency index," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).
    14. Bice Cavallo, 2019. "Coherent weights for pairwise comparison matrices and a mixed-integer linear programming problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 143-161, September.
    15. S. Lipovetsky, 2009. "Global Priority Estimation in Multiperson Decision Making," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 77-91, January.
    16. Sándor Bozóki, 2008. "Solution of the least squares method problem of pairwise comparison matrices," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 16(4), pages 345-358, December.
    17. Jiří Mazurek & Konrad Kulakowski, 2020. "Information gap in value propositions of business models of language schools," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 30(2), pages 77-89.
    18. Xin Jiang & Ligang Zhou & Hao Li & Qun Wu & Wenming Yang, 2025. "Stochastic Group Preference Analysis Framework for Interval Multiplicative Preference Relations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 589-621, June.
    19. Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio, 2016. "Combining analytical hierarchy process and Choquet integral within non-additive robust ordinal regression," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 2-18.
    20. Szádoczki, Zsombor & Bozóki, Sándor & Tekile, Hailemariam Abebe, 2022. "Filling in pattern designs for incomplete pairwise comparison matrices: (Quasi-)regular graphs with minimal diameter," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:328:y:2026:i:3:p:938-945. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.