IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v253y2016i3p557-569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benders decomposition without separability: A computational study for capacitated facility location problems

Author

Listed:
  • Fischetti, Matteo
  • Ljubić, Ivana
  • Sinnl, Markus

Abstract

Benders is one of the most famous decomposition tools for Mathematical Programming, and it is the method of choice e.g., in mixed-integer stochastic programming. Its hallmark is the capability of decomposing certain types of models into smaller subproblems, each of which can be solved individually to produce local information (notably, cutting planes) to be exploited by a centralized “master” problem. As its name suggests, the power of the technique comes essentially from the decomposition effect, i.e., the separability of the problem into a master problem and several smaller subproblems. In this paper we address the question of whether the Benders approach can be useful even without separability of the subproblem, i.e., when its application yields a single subproblem of the same size as the original problem. In particular, we focus on the capacitated facility location problem, in two variants: the classical linear case, and a “congested” case where the objective function contains convex but non-separable quadratic terms. We show how to embed the Benders approach within a modern branch-and-cut mixed-integer programming solver, addressing explicitly all the ingredients that are instrumental for its success. In particular, we discuss some computational aspects that are related to the negative effects derived from the lack of separability. Extensive computational results on various classes of instances from the literature are reported, with a comparison with the state-of-the-art exact and heuristic algorithms. The outcome is that a clever but simple implementation of the Benders approach can be very effective even without separability, as its performance is comparable and sometimes even better than that of the most effective and sophisticated algorithms proposed in the previous literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Fischetti, Matteo & Ljubić, Ivana & Sinnl, Markus, 2016. "Benders decomposition without separability: A computational study for capacitated facility location problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 557-569.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:253:y:2016:i:3:p:557-569
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.03.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221716301126
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.03.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klose, Andreas & Gortz, Simon, 2007. "A branch-and-price algorithm for the capacitated facility location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(3), pages 1109-1125, June.
    2. Tony J. Van Roy, 1986. "A Cross Decomposition Algorithm for Capacitated Facility Location," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 145-163, February.
    3. Pasquale Avella & Maurizio Boccia, 2009. "A cutting plane algorithm for the capacitated facility location problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 39-65, May.
    4. Klose, Andreas & Drexl, Andreas, 2005. "Facility location models for distribution system design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(1), pages 4-29, April.
    5. Zhang, Yue & Berman, Oded & Verter, Vedat, 2009. "Incorporating congestion in preventive healthcare facility network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 922-935, November.
    6. François Vanderbeck, 2005. "Implementing Mixed Integer Column Generation," Springer Books, in: Guy Desaulniers & Jacques Desrosiers & Marius M. Solomon (ed.), Column Generation, chapter 0, pages 331-358, Springer.
    7. T. L. Magnanti & R. T. Wong, 1981. "Accelerating Benders Decomposition: Algorithmic Enhancement and Model Selection Criteria," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 464-484, June.
    8. Elena Fernández & Mercedes Landete, 2015. "Fixed-Charge Facility Location Problems," Springer Books, in: Gilbert Laporte & Stefan Nickel & Francisco Saldanha da Gama (ed.), Location Science, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 47-77, Springer.
    9. Simon Görtz & Andreas Klose, 2012. "A Simple but Usually Fast Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for the Capacitated Facility Location Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 597-610, November.
    10. Boffey, Brian & Galvao, Roberto & Espejo, Luis, 2007. "A review of congestion models in the location of facilities with immobile servers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(3), pages 643-662, May.
    11. Cornuejols, G. & Sridharan, R. & Thizy, J. M., 1991. "A comparison of heuristics and relaxations for the capacitated plant location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 280-297, February.
    12. Robert Aboolian & Oded Berman & Dmitry Krass, 2012. "Profit Maximizing Distributed Service System Design with Congestion and Elastic Demand," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 247-261, May.
    13. Harkness, Joseph & ReVelle, Charles, 2003. "Facility location with increasing production costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 1-13, February.
    14. Joe Naoum-Sawaya & Samir Elhedhli, 2013. "An interior-point Benders based branch-and-cut algorithm for mixed integer programs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 33-55, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christensen, Tue Rauff Lind & Klose, Andreas, 2021. "A fast exact method for the capacitated facility location problem with differentiable convex production costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 855-868.
    2. Avella, P. & Boccia, M. & Mattia, S. & Rossi, F., 2021. "Weak flow cover inequalities for the capacitated facility location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 485-494.
    3. Corberán, Ángel & Landete, Mercedes & Peiró, Juanjo & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2020. "The facility location problem with capacity transfers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Liu, Weiwei & Kong, Nan & Wang, Mingzheng & Zhang, Lingling, 2021. "Sustainable multi-commodity capacitated facility location problem with complementarity demand functions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Klose, Andreas & Gortz, Simon, 2007. "A branch-and-price algorithm for the capacitated facility location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(3), pages 1109-1125, June.
    6. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Hoseinpour, Pooya, 2019. "Service system design for managing interruption risks: A backup-service risk-mitigation strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 417-431.
    7. Simon Görtz & Andreas Klose, 2012. "A Simple but Usually Fast Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for the Capacitated Facility Location Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 597-610, November.
    8. Hoseinpour, Pooya & Ahmadi-Javid, Amir, 2016. "A profit-maximization location-capacity model for designing a service system with risk of service interruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 113-134.
    9. Weninger, Dieter & Wolsey, Laurence A., 2023. "Benders-type branch-and-cut algorithms for capacitated facility location with single-sourcing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 84-99.
    10. Zhang, Yue & Liang, Liping & Liu, Emma & Chen, Chong & Atkins, Derek, 2016. "Patient choice analysis and demand prediction for a health care diagnostics company," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 198-205.
    11. Matteo Fischetti & Ivana Ljubić & Markus Sinnl, 2017. "Redesigning Benders Decomposition for Large-Scale Facility Location," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(7), pages 2146-2162, July.
    12. Han, Jialin & Zhang, Jiaxiang & Zeng, Bing & Mao, Mingsong, 2021. "Optimizing dynamic facility location-allocation for agricultural machinery maintenance using Benders decomposition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    13. Vedat Bayram & Hande Yaman, 2018. "Shelter Location and Evacuation Route Assignment Under Uncertainty: A Benders Decomposition Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 416-436, March.
    14. Klose, Andreas & Drexl, Andreas, 2005. "Facility location models for distribution system design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(1), pages 4-29, April.
    15. Ogbe, Emmanuel & Li, Xiang, 2017. "A new cross decomposition method for stochastic mixed-integer linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(2), pages 487-499.
    16. Elisangela Martins de Sá & Ivan Contreras & Jean-François Cordeau & Ricardo Saraiva de Camargo & Gilberto de Miranda, 2015. "The Hub Line Location Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 500-518, August.
    17. Sune Lauth Gadegaard & Andreas Klose & Lars Relund Nielsen, 2018. "An improved cut-and-solve algorithm for the single-source capacitated facility location problem," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(1), pages 1-27, March.
    18. Yossiri Adulyasak & Jean-François Cordeau & Raf Jans, 2015. "Benders Decomposition for Production Routing Under Demand Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 851-867, August.
    19. Harkness, Joseph & ReVelle, Charles, 2003. "Facility location with increasing production costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 1-13, February.
    20. Emelogu, Adindu & Chowdhury, Sudipta & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Bian, Linkan & Eksioglu, Burak, 2016. "An enhanced sample average approximation method for stochastic optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 230-252.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:253:y:2016:i:3:p:557-569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.