IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v248y2016i3p943-953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

DASH: Dynamic Approach for Switching Heuristics

Author

Listed:
  • Liberto, Giovanni Di
  • Kadioglu, Serdar
  • Leo, Kevin
  • Malitsky, Yuri

Abstract

Complete tree search is a highly effective method for tackling Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP) problems, and over the years, a plethora of branching heuristics have been introduced to further refine the technique for varying problems. Yet while each new approach continued to push the state-of-the-art, parallel research began to repeatedly demonstrate that there is no single method that would perform the best on all problem instances. Tackling this issue, portfolio algorithms took the process a step further, by trying to predict the best heuristic for each instance at hand. However, the motivation behind algorithm selection can be taken further still, and used to dynamically choose the most appropriate algorithm for each encountered sub-problem. In this paper we identify a feature space that captures both the evolution of the problem in the branching tree and the similarity among sub-problems of instances from the same MIP models. We show how to exploit these features on-the-fly in order to decide the best time to switch the branching variable selection heuristic and then show how such a system can be trained efficiently. Experiments on a highly heterogeneous collection of hard MIP instances show significant gains over the standard pure approach which commits to a single heuristic throughout the search.

Suggested Citation

  • Liberto, Giovanni Di & Kadioglu, Serdar & Leo, Kevin & Malitsky, Yuri, 2016. "DASH: Dynamic Approach for Switching Heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 943-953.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:248:y:2016:i:3:p:943-953
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221715007559
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. G. Mitten, 1970. "Branch-and-Bound Methods: General Formulation and Properties," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 24-34, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nikolaus Furian & Michael O’Sullivan & Cameron Walker & Eranda Çela, 2021. "A machine learning-based branch and price algorithm for a sampled vehicle routing problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(3), pages 693-732, September.
    2. Yu Yang & Natashia Boland & Martin Savelsbergh, 2021. "Multivariable Branching: A 0-1 Knapsack Problem Case Study," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1354-1367, October.
    3. Bissan Ghaddar & Ignacio Gómez-Casares & Julio González-Díaz & Brais González-Rodríguez & Beatriz Pateiro-López & Sofía Rodríguez-Ballesteros, 2023. "Learning for Spatial Branching: An Algorithm Selection Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1024-1043, September.
    4. Bengio, Yoshua & Lodi, Andrea & Prouvost, Antoine, 2021. "Machine learning for combinatorial optimization: A methodological tour d’horizon," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 405-421.
    5. Andrea Lodi & Giulia Zarpellon, 2017. "On learning and branching: a survey," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(2), pages 207-236, July.
    6. Alejandro Marcos Alvarez & Quentin Louveaux & Louis Wehenkel, 2017. "A Machine Learning-Based Approximation of Strong Branching," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 185-195, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. E A Silver, 2004. "An overview of heuristic solution methods," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(9), pages 936-956, September.
    2. Y. Xu & T. K. Ralphs & L. Ladányi & M. J. Saltzman, 2009. "Computational Experience with a Software Framework for Parallel Integer Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 383-397, August.
    3. S S Chauhan & J-M Proth & A M Sarmiento & R Nagi, 2006. "Opportunistic supply chain formation from qualified partners for a new market demand," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(9), pages 1089-1099, September.
    4. Makowski, David & Hendrix, Eligius M. T. & van Ittersum, Martin K. & Rossing, Walter A. H., 2001. "Generation and presentation of nearly optimal solutions for mixed-integer linear programming, applied to a case in farming system design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 425-438, July.
    5. Hendrix, Eligius M.T. & Casado, Leocadio G. & Garcí­a, Inmaculada, 2008. "The semi-continuous quadratic mixture design problem: Description and branch-and-bound approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(3), pages 803-815, December.
    6. Jiancheng Long & Wai Yuen Szeto, 2019. "Link-Based System Optimum Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problems in General Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 167-182, January.
    7. Jouglet, Antoine & Carlier, Jacques, 2011. "Dominance rules in combinatorial optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 433-444, August.
    8. Stanisław Gawiejnowicz, 2020. "A review of four decades of time-dependent scheduling: main results, new topics, and open problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 3-47, February.
    9. Chauhan, Satyaveer S. & Frayret, Jean-Marc & LeBel, Luc, 2009. "Multi-commodity supply network planning in the forest supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 688-696, July.
    10. M. A. Venkataramanan & Kathryn A. Wilson, 1991. "A branch‐and‐bound algorithm for flow‐path design of automated guided vehicle systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(3), pages 431-445, June.
    11. Juan Herrera & Leocadio Casado & Eligius Hendrix & Inmaculada García, 2014. "Pareto optimality and robustness in bi-blending problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 254-273, April.
    12. Thomas L. Morin & Roy E. Marsten, 1974. "Brand-and-Bound Strategies for Dynamic Programming," Discussion Papers 106, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    13. Serdar Kadıoğlu, 2019. "Core group placement: allocation and provisioning of heterogeneous resources," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(3), pages 243-264, September.
    14. Lenstra, J. K. & Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G., 1980. "A Recursive Approach To The Implementation Of Enumerative Methods," Econometric Institute Archives 272202, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    15. Rafael Blanquero & Emilio Carrizosa, 2013. "Solving the median problem with continuous demand on a network," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 723-734, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:248:y:2016:i:3:p:943-953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.