IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v203y2010i1p50-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solving the 2-rooted mini-max spanning forest problem by branch-and-bound

Author

Listed:
  • Mekking, M.
  • Volgenant, A.

Abstract

The 2-rooted mini-max spanning forest problem is to find a spanning forest with two given root nodes on an undirected graph, such that the maximum tree cost in this forest is minimized. We introduce a branch-and-bound algorithm based on selecting nodes. On test instances up to 50 nodes the algorithm gives much better computational results than a known algorithm that is based on selecting edges. Furthermore the new algorithm can easily solve problem instances up to 80 nodes. We consider some alternative and polynomial criteria. Finally we discuss some generalizations, e.g., the problem without given root nodes, i.e., the root nodes have to be chosen.

Suggested Citation

  • Mekking, M. & Volgenant, A., 2010. "Solving the 2-rooted mini-max spanning forest problem by branch-and-bound," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 50-58, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:203:y:2010:i:1:p:50-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(09)00525-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yamada, Takeo & Takahashi, Hideo & Kataoka, Seiji, 1996. "A heuristic algorithm for the mini-max spanning forest problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 565-572, June.
    2. Yamada, Takeo & Takahashi, Hideo & Kataoka, Seiji, 1997. "A branch-and-bound algorithm for the mini-max spanning forest problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 93-103, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. da Cunha, Alexandre Salles & Simonetti, Luidi & Lucena, Abilio, 2015. "Optimality cuts and a branch-and-cut algorithm for the K-rooted mini-max spanning forest problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 392-399.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kataoka, Seiji & Araki, Norio & Yamada, Takeo, 2000. "Upper and lower bounding procedures for minimum rooted k-subtree problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 561-569, May.
    2. da Cunha, Alexandre Salles & Simonetti, Luidi & Lucena, Abilio, 2015. "Optimality cuts and a branch-and-cut algorithm for the K-rooted mini-max spanning forest problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 392-399.
    3. Fujimoto, Masako & Yamada, Takeo, 2006. "An exact algorithm for the knapsack sharing problem with common items," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 693-707, June.
    4. Xiaofei Liu & Yajie Li & Weidong Li & Jinhua Yang, 2023. "Combinatorial approximation algorithms for the maximum bounded connected bipartition problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Federica Ricca & Andrea Scozzari & Bruno Simeone, 2013. "Political Districting: from classical models to recent approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 271-299, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:203:y:2010:i:1:p:50-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.