IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v199y2009i2p512-519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New variants of pairwise classification

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysko, Miroslaw
  • Wolynski, Waldemar

Abstract

Pairwise classification is the technique that deals with multi-class problems by converting them into a series of binary problems, one for each pair of classes. Typically, K-class classification rules tend to be easier to learn for KÂ =Â 2 than for KÂ >Â 2 - only one decision boundary requires attention. This paper presents new methods for obtaining class membership probability estimates for multi-class classification problems by coupling the probability estimates created by binary classifiers. Classifiers used include linear Bayes normal classifier, Parzen density based classifier, naive Bayes classifier, binary decision tree classifier and random neural net classifier. The accuracy of new pairwise classifiers is examined on some real data sets. The classification errors were estimated by stratified version of 10-fold cross-validation technique, i.e. the training examples were partitioned into 10 equal-sized blocks with similar class distributions as in the original set. The validation technique was repeated 10 times for each data set.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysko, Miroslaw & Wolynski, Waldemar, 2009. "New variants of pairwise classification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 512-519, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:199:y:2009:i:2:p:512-519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(08)00975-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olafsson, Sigurdur & Li, Xiaonan & Wu, Shuning, 2008. "Operations research and data mining," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1429-1448, June.
    2. Blaszczynski, Jerzy & Greco, Salvatore & Slowinski, Roman, 2007. "Multi-criteria classification - A new scheme for application of dominance-based decision rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1030-1044, September.
    3. Oladunni, Olutayo O. & Trafalis, Theodore B., 2009. "A regularized pairwise multi-classification knowledge-based machine and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(3), pages 924-941, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koen W. de Bock & Kristof Coussement & Arno De Caigny & Roman Slowiński & Bart Baesens & Robert N Boute & Tsan-Ming Choi & Dursun Delen & Mathias Kraus & Stefan Lessmann & Sebastián Maldonado & David , 2023. "Explainable AI for Operational Research: A Defining Framework, Methods, Applications, and a Research Agenda," Post-Print hal-04219546, HAL.
    2. Corne, David & Dhaenens, Clarisse & Jourdan, Laetitia, 2012. "Synergies between operations research and data mining: The emerging use of multi-objective approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(3), pages 469-479.
    3. Fernandez, Eduardo & Navarro, Jorge & Bernal, Sergio, 2010. "Handling multicriteria preferences in cluster analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 819-827, May.
    4. Mark Gilchrist & Deana Lehmann Mooers & Glenn Skrubbeltrang & Francine Vachon, 2012. "Knowledge Discovery in Databases for Competitive Advantage," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(2), pages 2-15, April.
    5. Pawel Lezanski & Maria Pilacinska, 2018. "The dominance-based rough set approach to cylindrical plunge grinding process diagnosis," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 989-1004, June.
    6. Azam, Nouman & Zhang, Yan & Yao, JingTao, 2017. "Evaluation functions and decision conditions of three-way decisions with game-theoretic rough sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 704-714.
    7. Hu, Qiwei & Chakhar, Salem & Siraj, Sajid & Labib, Ashraf, 2017. "Spare parts classification in industrial manufacturing using the dominance-based rough set approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1136-1163.
    8. Oppio, Alessandra & Dell’Ovo, Marta & Torrieri, Francesca & Miebs, Grzegorz & Kadziński, Miłosz, 2020. "Understanding the drivers of Urban Development Agreements with the rough set approach and robust decision rules," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Carrizosa, Emilio & Guerrero, Vanesa & Romero Morales, Dolores, 2018. "On Mathematical Optimization for the visualization of frequencies and adjacencies as rectangular maps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 290-302.
    10. Abbas Mardani & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Madjid Tavana & Romualdas Bausys & Othman Ibrahim, 2017. "Recent Fuzzy Generalisations of Rough Sets Theory: A Systematic Review and Methodological Critique of the Literature," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-33, October.
    11. Tlili, Ali & Belahcène, Khaled & Khaled, Oumaima & Mousseau, Vincent & Ouerdane, Wassila, 2022. "Learning non-compensatory sorting models using efficient SAT/MaxSAT formulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 979-1006.
    12. Davidson, Ian & Tayi, Giri, 2009. "Data preparation using data quality matrices for classification mining," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 764-772, September.
    13. Daniel Gartner & Yiye Zhang & Rema Padman, 2018. "Cognitive workload reduction in hospital information systems," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 224-243, June.
    14. Fernandez, Eduardo & Navarro, Jorge & Bernal, Sergio, 2009. "Multicriteria sorting using a valued indifference relation under a preference disaggregation paradigm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 602-609, October.
    15. Tom Pape, 2020. "Prioritising data items for business analytics: Framework and application to human resources," Papers 2012.13813, arXiv.org.
    16. Heydari Majeed & Yousefli Amir, 2017. "A new optimization model for market basket analysis with allocation considerations: A genetic algorithm solution approach," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, March.
    17. Anzanello, Michel J. & Albin, Susan L. & Chaovalitwongse, Wanpracha A., 2012. "Multicriteria variable selection for classification of production batches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 97-105.
    18. Jesse G. Wales & Alexander J. Zolan & William T. Hamilton & Alexandra M. Newman & Michael J. Wagner, 2023. "Combining simulation and optimization to derive operating policies for a concentrating solar power plant," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 45(1), pages 119-150, March.
    19. Geuens, Stijn & Coussement, Kristof & De Bock, Koen W., 2018. "A framework for configuring collaborative filtering-based recommendations derived from purchase data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 208-218.
    20. Bouzayane, Sarra & Saad, Inès, 2020. "A multicriteria approach based on rough set theory for the incremental Periodic prediction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 282-298.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:199:y:2009:i:2:p:512-519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.