IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v508y2025ics0304380025001814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring with multiple goals: Bayesian methods for changing objectives

Author

Listed:
  • Golding, Jessie D.
  • McKelvey, Kevin S.
  • Schwartz, Michael K.
  • Millspaugh, Joshua J.
  • Sanderlin, Jamie S.
  • Jackson, Scott D.

Abstract

Long-term monitoring is essential for wildlife conservation. Most wildlife population attributes require long-term monitoring to evaluate. Over the time for attributes to resolve through monitoring, however, information needs change. Existing frameworks to accommodate information need changes, such as adaptive monitoring and management, are built for large-scale, programmatic changes. Often, smaller, rapid changes are necessary. Fortunately, information needs can change predictably in wildlife monitoring, even when little is known about populations. Predictable changes include the desire to answer: 1) is the species present?; 2) are multiple individuals present?; 3) is breeding occurring?. We suggest long-term monitoring can accommodate these changes. We propose Goal Efficient Monitoring (GEM), an approach that uses a Bayesian integrated population model (BIPM) to accommodate changing information needs through: a BIPM that links population state changes (e.g., present, multiple individuals present) to population dynamics (e.g., abundance, demographic rates); and sampling rules to allocate effort observation effort based on current knowledge. To test the efficacy of a GEM approach, we ask two research questions: 1) can implementing a GEM approach provide robust population estimates?; and 2) do GEM sampling rules in multiple long-term monitoring settings (i.e., population sizes) accommodate changing questions while providing continual, reliable population inference? To answer these questions, we built a BIPM and conducted a simulation study for a rare species in the US, Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis). We simulated lynx populations under five different starting conditions and simulated a GEM approach (10 years of simulated observations with GEM sampling rules), then used our BIPM model to produce estimates and predictions. In 93 % of simulations, 95 % credible intervals for BIMP estimates contained the true value for all biological (abundance of all sexes and age classes, birth events, survival, state transition probabilities) and observation variables (detection probabilities). We demonstrate how a GEM approach can provide reliable long-term inference while being responsive to shifting information needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Golding, Jessie D. & McKelvey, Kevin S. & Schwartz, Michael K. & Millspaugh, Joshua J. & Sanderlin, Jamie S. & Jackson, Scott D., 2025. "Monitoring with multiple goals: Bayesian methods for changing objectives," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 508(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:508:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001814
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025001814
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:508:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.