Author
Listed:
- Golding, Jessie D.
- McKelvey, Kevin S.
- Schwartz, Michael K.
- Millspaugh, Joshua J.
- Sanderlin, Jamie S.
- Jackson, Scott D.
Abstract
Long-term monitoring is essential for wildlife conservation. Most wildlife population attributes require long-term monitoring to evaluate. Over the time for attributes to resolve through monitoring, however, information needs change. Existing frameworks to accommodate information need changes, such as adaptive monitoring and management, are built for large-scale, programmatic changes. Often, smaller, rapid changes are necessary. Fortunately, information needs can change predictably in wildlife monitoring, even when little is known about populations. Predictable changes include the desire to answer: 1) is the species present?; 2) are multiple individuals present?; 3) is breeding occurring?. We suggest long-term monitoring can accommodate these changes. We propose Goal Efficient Monitoring (GEM), an approach that uses a Bayesian integrated population model (BIPM) to accommodate changing information needs through: a BIPM that links population state changes (e.g., present, multiple individuals present) to population dynamics (e.g., abundance, demographic rates); and sampling rules to allocate effort observation effort based on current knowledge. To test the efficacy of a GEM approach, we ask two research questions: 1) can implementing a GEM approach provide robust population estimates?; and 2) do GEM sampling rules in multiple long-term monitoring settings (i.e., population sizes) accommodate changing questions while providing continual, reliable population inference? To answer these questions, we built a BIPM and conducted a simulation study for a rare species in the US, Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis). We simulated lynx populations under five different starting conditions and simulated a GEM approach (10 years of simulated observations with GEM sampling rules), then used our BIPM model to produce estimates and predictions. In 93 % of simulations, 95 % credible intervals for BIMP estimates contained the true value for all biological (abundance of all sexes and age classes, birth events, survival, state transition probabilities) and observation variables (detection probabilities). We demonstrate how a GEM approach can provide reliable long-term inference while being responsive to shifting information needs.
Suggested Citation
Golding, Jessie D. & McKelvey, Kevin S. & Schwartz, Michael K. & Millspaugh, Joshua J. & Sanderlin, Jamie S. & Jackson, Scott D., 2025.
"Monitoring with multiple goals: Bayesian methods for changing objectives,"
Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 508(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:508:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001814
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111196
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Dennis Murphy & Paul Weiland, 2014.
"Science and structured decision making: fulfilling the promise of adaptive management for imperiled species,"
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 4(3), pages 200-207, September.
- Tempel, Douglas J. & Peery, M.Z. & GutiƩrrez, R.J., 2014.
"Using integrated population models to improve conservation monitoring: California spotted owls as a case study,"
Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 289(C), pages 86-95.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Johnson, Fred A. & Zimmerman, Guthrie S. & Jensen, Gitte H. & Clausen, Kevin K. & Frederiksen, Morten & Madsen, Jesper, 2020.
"Using integrated population models for insights into monitoring programs: An application using pink-footed geese,"
Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:508:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.