IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v501y2025ics0304380024003909.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of California condor populations to reintroductions, reinforcements, and reductions in spent lead ammunition pollution

Author

Listed:
  • Marcot, Bruce G.
  • Schumaker, Nathan H.
  • D'Elia, Jesse

Abstract

The California Condor (CACO; Gymnogyps californianus) is a critically-endangered apex scavenger with multiple reintroduction sites providing population reinforcement. Spent lead ammunition pollution in CACO food (i.e., carrion and gut piles) was most likely responsible for the decline of CACO populations in the twentieth century and continues to be the leading source of condor mortality. To aid condor recovery decisions for the California population, numbering approximately 200 in early 2024, we present results from a female-only, individual-based life cycle model. We simulated future CACO population size under each of 25 scenarios representing combinations of 5 levels of reintroductions of captive-bred CACO released in California, and 5 levels of lead reduction, projected over a 25-year forecast. Under the scenario of no change in current reinforcements or lead occurrence, CACO populations are projected to increase to 259 females; under the worst-case scenario of halting all reinforcements and no decrease in lead pollution, populations are projected to decline to 49 females; and under the best-case scenario of fully-enhanced reinforcements and complete elimination of lead pollution, populations are projected to increase to 569 females, with other scenarios having intermediate results. Our model predicted substantial improvements in population size even with incremental reductions in lead ammunition pollution, although we caution that population size is an incomplete measure of population health. Our maps of simulated foraging movements suggest a widespread expansion of condors throughout California and southwest Oregon under the best-case scenario, and major reduction with no expansion in distribution under the worst-case scenario. Our model serves as a framework for evaluating the efficacy of alternative recovery actions, and could be further enhanced to include economic and socio-economic tradeoffs associated with condor recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcot, Bruce G. & Schumaker, Nathan H. & D'Elia, Jesse, 2025. "Response of California condor populations to reintroductions, reinforcements, and reductions in spent lead ammunition pollution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 501(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:501:y:2025:i:c:s0304380024003909
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.111002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024003909
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.111002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Max Kozlov, 2023. "US will vaccinate birds against avian flu for first time — what researchers think," Nature, Nature, vol. 618(7964), pages 220-221, June.
    2. Laura M. Keating & Lea Randall & Rebecca Stanton & Casey McCormack & Michael Lucid & Travis Seaborn & Sarah J. Converse & Stefano Canessa & Axel Moehrenschlager, 2023. "Using Decision Analysis to Determine the Feasibility of a Conservation Translocation," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 295-310, December.
    3. Armstrong, Doug P. & Parlato, Elizabeth H. & Frost, Peter G.H., 2021. "Incorporating individual variation in survival, reproduction and detection rates when projecting dynamics of small populations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    4. Maestri, María Laura & Ferrati, Rosana & Berkunsky, Igor, 2017. "Evaluating management strategies in the conservation of the critically endangered Blue-throated Macaw (Ara glaucogularis)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 361(C), pages 74-79.
    5. Etterson, Matthew A. & Ellis-Felege, Susan N. & Evers, David & Gauthier, Gilles & Grzybowski, Joseph A. & Mattsson, Brady J. & Nagy, Laura R. & Olsen, Brian J. & Pease, Craig M. & van der Burg, Max Po, 2011. "Modeling fecundity in birds: Conceptual overview, current models, and considerations for future developments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2178-2190.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Romanov, Michael S. & Masterov, Vladimir B., 2020. "Low breeding performance of the Steller’s sea eagle (Haliaeetus pelagicus) causes the populations to decline," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 420(C).
    2. Oksana Zhdanova & Alexey Kuzin & Efim Frisman, 2022. "The Harvest Effect on Dynamics of Northern Fur Seal Population: Mathematical Modeling and Data Analysis Results," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Kelly F. Robinson & Erin Baker & Elizabeth Ewing & Victoria Hemming & Melissa A. Kenney & Michael C. Runge, 2023. "Decision Analysis to Advance Environmental Sustainability," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 243-251, December.
    4. Morgan L. Piczak & Jessica A. Robichaud & Peter Morrison & Andrew M. Rous & Ingeborg M. Mulder & Cassandra J. Hill & Tanya S. Prystay & Hanna Rosner-Katz & Kelly F. Robinson & Joseph R. Bennett & Stev, 2024. "Structured decision making remains underused in ecological restoration despite opportunities," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:501:y:2025:i:c:s0304380024003909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.