IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v483y2023ics0304380023001485.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the impacts of a changing and disturbed environment on an endangered beluga whale population

Author

Listed:
  • McHuron, Elizabeth A.
  • Castellote, Manuel
  • Himes Boor, Gina K.
  • Shelden, Kim E.W.
  • Warlick, Amanda J.
  • McGuire, Tamara L.
  • Wade, Paul R.
  • Goetz, Kimberly T.

Abstract

Climate change and disturbance from human activities are key threats facing many wildlife populations worldwide. The ability to quantify the effects of such threats on individual health and population dynamics is critical for effective management and conservation. We used Stochastic Dynamic Programming (SDP), a method for implementing state-dependent life history theory, to explore the impacts of changes in prey availability and anthropogenic disturbance on survival and reproductive success of Cook Inlet belugas (Delphinapterus leucas, CIB), an endangered and isolated population in decline. We predicted behavioral decisions (whether to forage, travel to a new location, or rest) of pregnant CIBs within a spatially and seasonally dynamic prey landscape. We used those decisions to explore time-activity budgets and spatial use under a variety of hypothetical environmental scenarios and estimate the resulting impacts on body condition and vital rates. In all scenarios, foraging activity was highest during summer to capitalize on abundant prey, which in the model was assumed to be eulachon (Thaleichthys pacificus) and salmonids (Oncorhynchus spp.). This resulted in large increases in blubber reserves that pregnant CIBs relied on during October to April when prey was assumed to be less abundant. Prey availability outside of summer months was still critical, as it either exacerbated or buffered against reductions in prey availability during summer months. Spatial predictions of habitat use indicated that pregnant CIBs should forage in areas used historically that now appear to be abandoned, suggesting that prey availability alone is unlikely to explain the recent range contraction of CIBs to upper Cook Inlet. Reductions in prey availability from late spring to early fall adversely affected vital rates, but intermittent disturbances that resulted in lost foraging opportunities, such as those caused by anthropogenic activities during the ice-free season, had little impact on body condition or vital rates if prey were abundant during the summer and early fall. Accurate assessment of the effects of anthropogenic disturbance on CIBs requires robust data on both disturbances and year-round prey availability, as intermittent disturbances adversely affected survival and reproductive success when they occurred in environments with reduced prey availability. Our model represents an initial effort to fill a critical information gap for informing CIB management decisions, providing insights into conditions under which reductions in vital rates might be expected and highlighting key data needed to increase the applicability of the model to this endangered population.

Suggested Citation

  • McHuron, Elizabeth A. & Castellote, Manuel & Himes Boor, Gina K. & Shelden, Kim E.W. & Warlick, Amanda J. & McGuire, Tamara L. & Wade, Paul R. & Goetz, Kimberly T., 2023. "Modeling the impacts of a changing and disturbed environment on an endangered beluga whale population," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 483(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:483:y:2023:i:c:s0304380023001485
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380023001485
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110417?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mosnier, A. & Doniol-Valcroze, T. & Gosselin, J.-F. & Lesage, V. & Measures, L.N. & Hammill, M.O., 2015. "Insights into processes of population decline using an integrated population model: The case of the St. Lawrence Estuary beluga (Delphinapterus leucas)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 314(C), pages 15-31.
    2. Carter, Brian T.G. & Nielsen, Erik A., 2011. "Exploring ecological changes in Cook Inlet beluga whale habitat though traditional and local ecological knowledge of contributing factors for population decline," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 299-308, May.
    3. Bejarano, Adriana C. & Wells, Randall S. & Costa, Daniel P., 2017. "Development of a bioenergetic model for estimating energy requirements and prey biomass consumption of the bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 356(C), pages 162-172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johnson, Fred A. & Zimmerman, Guthrie S. & Jensen, Gitte H. & Clausen, Kevin K. & Frederiksen, Morten & Madsen, Jesper, 2020. "Using integrated population models for insights into monitoring programs: An application using pink-footed geese," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).
    2. Jonathan Credo & Jani C. Ingram, 2021. "Perspective Developing Successful Collaborative Research Partnerships with AI/AN Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-10, August.
    3. Merel Goedegebuure & Jessica Melbourne-Thomas & Stuart P Corney & Clive R McMahon & Mark A Hindell, 2018. "Modelling southern elephant seals Mirounga leonina using an individual-based model coupled with a dynamic energy budget," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-37, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:483:y:2023:i:c:s0304380023001485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.