IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v468y2022ics0304380022000783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Niche segregation on the landscape scale of two co-existing related congeners in the sympatric zone – modelling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kosicki, Jakub Z.

Abstract

Co-occurence of related congeners is one of the most complicated ecological phenomena. Although such species are characterised by niche conservatism, which should exclude their stable co-existence, a communities often consist of sister species. Thus, there must be some ecological mechanism that separates them spatially or temporally. This study advocates that the answer is niche divergence that results from interspecific competition. Despite numerous studies documenting this biotic interaction as an important ecological process that segregates species spatially, only few deal with niche divergence between allotopy and syntopy in a mosaic of a large sympatric zone. That is why I decided to analyse the co-existence of two sister species, the Whinchat Saxicola rubetra and the Stonechat Saxicola rubicola in a sympatric zone, where both species occur alongside in syntopic sites, and separately in allotopic sites. Besides, I analyse the Whinchat's potential niche divergence between sympatric and allopatric zones which can be designated on the territory of Poland. It is assumed that niche divergence resulting from interspecific competition can be observed on the basis of differences in habitat preferences of one or both species between syntopy and allotopy, and also for the Whinchat between the sympatric and the allopatric zone. The assumptions were tested in generalised mixed-effect modelling and contrast analyses based on a large dataset of bird density in Poland. Both species demonstrated shifted environmental preferences between syntopy and allotopy, while in allopatry both species had similar niche preferences. The Whinchat also indicated no differences between allopatry and allotopy. Thus, the adopted analytical system clearly proves that the co-existence of congeneric species is possible due to niche divergence, which most likely results from interspecific competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Kosicki, Jakub Z., 2022. "Niche segregation on the landscape scale of two co-existing related congeners in the sympatric zone – modelling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:468:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022000783
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022000783
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fourcade, Yoan, 2021. "Fine-tuning niche models matters in invasion ecology. A lesson from the land planarian Obama nungara," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 457(C).
    2. Kosicki, Jakub Z., 2017. "Should topographic metrics be considered when predicting species density of birds on a large geographical scale? A case of Random Forest approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 349(C), pages 76-85.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marchetto, Elisa & Da Re, Daniele & Tordoni, Enrico & Bazzichetto, Manuele & Zannini, Piero & Celebrin, Simone & Chieffallo, Ludovico & Malavasi, Marco & Rocchini, Duccio, 2023. "Testing the effect of sample prevalence and sampling methods on probability- and favourability-based SDMs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:468:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022000783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.