IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v425y2020ics030438002030106x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why do forests respond differently to nitrogen deposition? A modelling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Rotter, Pavel
  • Loreau, Michel
  • de Mazancourt, Claire

Abstract

Elevated reactive nitrogen deposition can result in declines in belowground C allocation to mycorrhiza, potentially threatening the sustainability of forest ecosystems, especially with regard to ongoing global environmental changes. Previous studies showed that the vulnerability of mycorrhiza differs in different forests. In this paper, we introduce a model that explains such differences as resulting from the optimization of belowground tree C investment in forests with inorganic or organic N economy. According to the model, the optimization of belowground tree C investment in forests with organic N economy is governed by indirect competition between trees for available forms of N. We predict decreasing C investment in mycorrhiza with N deposition in systems dominated by an organic N economy. In contrast, in forests with inorganic N economy the optimization of belowground tree C investment is governed by direct competition between trees for available forms of N. We show that C investment in mycorrhiza does not depend on N deposition in the case of inorganic N economy. Parameterizing the model with data from spruce and beech temperate forests, we show that spruce forests are more sensitive to N deposition with a decrease of tree investment in mycorrhiza, which seems to be consistent with empirical findings. As mycorrhizae are essential for nutrients and water acquisition in trees, we suggest our approach could contribute to predicting the responses of forests to global environmental changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Rotter, Pavel & Loreau, Michel & de Mazancourt, Claire, 2020. "Why do forests respond differently to nitrogen deposition? A modelling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 425(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:425:y:2020:i:c:s030438002030106x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438002030106X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colin Averill & Benjamin L. Turner & Adrien C. Finzi, 2014. "Mycorrhiza-mediated competition between plants and decomposers drives soil carbon storage," Nature, Nature, vol. 505(7484), pages 543-545, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudia Melis & Per-Arvid Wold & Anna Maria Billing & Kathrine Bjørgen & Børge Moe, 2020. "Kindergarten Children’s Perception about the Ecological Roles of Living Organisms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Dongwei Liu & Shanlong Li & Weixing Zhu & Yongyang Wang & Shasha Zhang & Yunting Fang, 2023. "Storage and Stability of Soil Organic Carbon in Two Temperate Forests in Northeastern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Piao Zhou & Lin Zhang & Shi Qi, 2022. "Plant Diversity and Aboveground Biomass Interact with Abiotic Factors to Drive Soil Organic Carbon in Beijing Mountainous Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Poonam Chauhan & Neha Sharma & Ashwani Tapwal & Ajay Kumar & Gaurav Swaroop Verma & Mukesh Meena & Chandra Shekhar Seth & Prashant Swapnil, 2023. "Soil Microbiome: Diversity, Benefits and Interactions with Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-43, October.
    5. Mengxia Zhou & Hui Yang & Tongbin Zhu & Cheng Zhang & Degen Zhu, 2022. "Preliminary Research on Agricultural Cultivation Decreasing Amino Sugar Accumulation in Calcareous Soils in Subtropical Karst Region of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Giuseppe Badagliacca & Maurizio Romeo & Emilio Lo Presti & Antonio Gelsomino & Michele Monti, 2020. "Factors Governing Total and Permanganate Oxidizable C Pools in Agricultural Soils from Southern Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Michael O’Sullivan & Pierre Friedlingstein & Stephen Sitch & Peter Anthoni & Almut Arneth & Vivek K. Arora & Vladislav Bastrikov & Christine Delire & Daniel S. Goll & Atul Jain & Etsushi Kato & Daniel, 2022. "Process-oriented analysis of dominant sources of uncertainty in the land carbon sink," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Shan Luo & Richard P. Phillips & Insu Jo & Songlin Fei & Jingjing Liang & Bernhard Schmid & Nico Eisenhauer, 2023. "Higher productivity in forests with mixed mycorrhizal strategies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Ieva Mockeviciene & Danute Karcauskiene & Alvyra Slepetiene & Monika Vilkiene & Regina Repsiene & Zita Braziene & Olga Anne, 2022. "Influence of Liming Intensity on Fractions of Humified Organic Carbon in Acid Soil: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Zachary Michael Isaac Gould & Vikram Mohanty & Georg Reichard & Walid Saad & Tripp Shealy & Susan Day, 2023. "A Mycorrhizal Model for Transactive Solar Energy Markets with Battery Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:425:y:2020:i:c:s030438002030106x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.