IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v387y2018icp154-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On predicting species yields in multispecies communities: Quantifying the accuracy of the linear Lotka-Volterra generalized model

Author

Listed:
  • Fort, Hugo

Abstract

The linear generalized Lotka–Volterra equations (LGLVE) constitute the simplest theoretical framework for ecological communities involving different kinds of interspecific interactions ―e.g. competition, facilitation. These equations have been often criticized as being too simple to model real systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Fort, Hugo, 2018. "On predicting species yields in multispecies communities: Quantifying the accuracy of the linear Lotka-Volterra generalized model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 387(C), pages 154-162.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:387:y:2018:i:c:p:154-162
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380018303053
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin Li, 2017. "Assessing the accuracy of predictive models for numerical data: Not r nor r2, why not? Then what?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Fort, Hugo, 2018. "Quantitative predictions from competition theory with an incomplete knowledge of model parameters tested against experiments across diverse taxa," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 104-110.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fort, Hugo & Grigera, Tomás S., 2021. "A method for predicting species trajectories tested with trees in barro colorado tropical forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 446(C).
    2. Fort, Hugo, 2020. "Making quantitative predictions on the yield of a species immersed in a multispecies community: The focal species method," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 430(C).
    3. AlAdwani, Mohammad & Saavedra, Serguei, 2022. "Feasibility conditions of ecological models: Unfolding links between model parameters," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fort, Hugo, 2020. "Making quantitative predictions on the yield of a species immersed in a multispecies community: The focal species method," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 430(C).
    2. Rufino, Marta M. & Albouy, Camille & Brind'Amour, Anik, 2021. "Which spatial interpolators I should use? A case study applying to marine species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 449(C).
    3. Siwei Li & Jingjing An & Yaqiu Li & Xiagu Zhu & Dongdong Zhao & Lixian Wang & Yonghui Sun & Yuanzhao Yang & Changhao Bi & Xueli Zhang & Meng Wang, 2022. "Automated high-throughput genome editing platform with an AI learning in situ prediction model," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Ritabrata Roy & Mrinmoy Majumder, 2022. "Assessment of water quality trends in Deepor Beel, Assam, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 14327-14347, December.
    5. Shinyoung Kwag & Daegi Hahm & Minkyu Kim & Seunghyun Eem, 2020. "Development of a Probabilistic Seismic Performance Assessment Model of Slope Using Machine Learning Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Ahmad Al-Buenain & Mohamed Haouari & Jithu Reji Jacob, 2024. "Predicting Fan Attendance at Mega Sports Events—A Machine Learning Approach: A Case Study of the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    7. Daniel S. Maynard & Lalasia Bialic-Murphy & Constantin M. Zohner & Colin Averill & Johan Hoogen & Haozhi Ma & Lidong Mo & Gabriel Reuben Smith & Alicia T. R. Acosta & Isabelle Aubin & Erika Berenguer , 2022. "Global relationships in tree functional traits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:387:y:2018:i:c:p:154-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.